Ryan Conlin and Jeremy Schwartz discuss a landmark WSIAT decision which held sections of the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act unconstitutional, the potential fallout and strategies for managing workplace stress claims (and possibly certain wrongful dismissal claims) going forward.
Jeremy D. Schwartz / About Author
Related Posts
Human Rights Tribunal Finds that WSIB Discriminated Against an Injured Worker for Refusing to Provide Direct Deposit of Benefit Payments (Demo)
An injured worker has succeeded in a human rights application against the Workplace Safety Insurance Board (“WSIB”). The case related to a…
26 Nov 2012
Appellate Court Finds that CERB is not Deductible from Wrongful Dismissal Damages
By Jeremy Schwartz and Haadi Malik In 2020, the Federal Government introduced the Canada Emergency Response Benefit (“CERB”), which was…
28 Dec 2022
Back to Basics: HRTO Follows Figliola and Refuses to Allow Relitigation of WSIB Claim
In 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v Figliola (“Figliola”). The Figliola decision addressed the…
05 Dec 2014
Termination Clauses: Clearly Restrictive Language Necessary for Enforceability
The Alberta Court of Appeal recently upheld a trial decision that struck a termination clause down as unenforceable. The Facts…
15 Feb 2018
Bank of Nova Scotia Overtime Class-Action Settles Out of Court (Demo)
Employers often avoid making significant, compliance-oriented changes for fear that employees will discover their rights have been violated for years…
27 Aug 2014
Is it work-related? Novel workers’ compensation decisions deal with harassment and assault
It may seem fairly obvious when a worker breaks her leg “in the course of employment”. However, injuries and illnesses…
18 May 2017
Court Precludes Terminated Employee from Relying on Employer’s Apology
In April of 2009, a little known law called the Apology Act (the “Act”) entered into force. A very short act, it primarily…
17 Sep 2015
ONCA Finds “Golden Parachute” Provision not Implicitly Subject to the Duty to Mitigate
In a decision by a rare, five-judge panel, the Ontario Court of Appeal (ONCA) ruled that a specific notice provision…
25 Jun 2012
Ontario Court Continues Trend of Large Punitive Damages Awards (Demo)
By: Frank Portman Since 2008, Courts have wrestled with wrongful dismissal claims in which employees make claims of entitlements…
20 Nov 2015
Think You Suffered Family Status Discrimination? First Things First – Were You Employed in Ontario or B.C.? (Demo)
The law governing family status discrimination under human rights legislation is unsettled and varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. A new…
16 Apr 2019
Bill 66 Proposes Further Employer-Friendly Amendments to Workplace Laws
The Ontario government introduced Bill 66, Restoring Ontario’s Competitiveness Act, 2018 on December 6, 2018. Bill 66 passed First Reading, and is…
10 Dec 2018
2014 Q3 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 2: Landmark Employment Contract Decision
Jeff Murray discusses a recent landmark contract decision from the Supreme Court of Canada
14 Oct 2014
Court Rules no Class Action for Constructive Dismissal (Demo)
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice has refused to permit a group of former Allstate Insurance employees to sue Allstate…
29 Apr 2011
Workers can Simultaneously Receive WSIB LOE Benefits and ESA Termination Pay
A recent WSIAT decision considered the question of the impact of payments received by a worker receiving loss of earnings benefits upon…
24 Apr 2014
Minimizing Mitigation: Court of Appeal gives employee benefit of the doubt
A recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision dealt a blow to employers’ ability to credit employee mitigation efforts and income…
07 Jul 2017