This is segment 3 of 5 from our Q3 webinar held on Thursday, October 10, “Breach of Confidentiality Clauses in Settlements”
Related Posts
The Court of Appeal recently confirmed that an employer defamed an ex-employee when the employer filed a false report with…
This is segment 5 of 5 from our Q3 webinar held on Thursday, October 10, “Risks Associated with Reducing Post-Retirement Benefits”
Don’t miss our comprehensive, half-day training seminar at the Sheraton Toronto Airport on Thursday, September 22.
We have previously written on the decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Danbury v 1416088 Ontario Ltd (see our…
The law on addiction has evolved over the years in arbitral jurisprudence. Earlier decisions treated illness as a mitigating factor…
Allison Taylor discusses the recent Federal Court of Appeal decision which outlined a new, balanced test for family status discrimination…
The Canadian law on workplace violence and harassment continues to develop, particularly in relation to the duty to investigate. Employers…
A well-drafted contract protects not only the company but also its employees and senior personnel. In a recent decision, Richards v….
The federal government has re-introduced legislation to amend the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA). Bill C-12, Safeguarding Canadians’ Personal…
Over a period of five months, Crown Metal Packaging Canada LP provided Mr. Di Tomaso with five notices of termination, containing four…
Frank discusses how to best ensure you may rely on disciplinary records to prove just cause
The Alberta Court of Appeal recently upheld a trial decision that struck a termination clause down as unenforceable. The Facts…
A recent decision of the Divisional Court raises the issue of when an individual can be found personally liable in…
We have previously written on the decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Danbury v 1416088 Ontario Ltd (see our…
This is segment 2 of 5 from our Q3 webinar held on Thursday, October 10, “Recent Developments in Summary Judgement Motions”

