The Ontario Superior Court has ruled that an employee who continued to work for 15 months following a change in his terms and conditions of employment had not condoned the change and could claim damages for constructive dismissal. Read more about this surprising decision and key lessons for employers to learn in our Latest Update.
Jeremy D. Schwartz / About Author
Related Posts
Does Human Rights Legislation Apply to Job Ads on Facebook?
Technological advancements frequently outpace the law’s ability to respond to the challenges they create. With the click of a button,…
12 Apr 2019
Court Strikes Down Termination Provision that Provides For Salary During Notice Period
Increasingly, the courts are striking down termination provisions in employment contracts resulting in lengthy common law notice awards to employees. …
22 May 2015
Pay in Lieu of Notice by Salary Continuance Deemed Implicit Right
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently ruled in Bowes v. Goss Power Products Ltd., that a fairly standard termination provision…
29 Sep 2011
Mud in the Water: Divisional Court holds limiting language required to displace presumption of reasonable notice
It is becoming increasingly difficult for employers to understand what language is required in order for a termination clause to…
18 Dec 2018
WSIB loss of Earnings Benefits still offset against Wrongful Dismissal Damages in Ontario
In a recent decision, Jensen v. Schaeffler Canada Inc., the Ontario Superior Court of Justice reduced an employee’s pay in lieu of…
25 Jul 2011
2013 Q4 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 4: Punitive Damages
Jeremy Schwartz discusses recent punitive damages awards in Ontario
21 Jan 2014
Continuing to Work Following Changes to Employment Not Considered Acceptance of Changes – Joe Morrison
Continuing to Work Following Changes to Employment Not Considered Acceptance of Changes – Joe Morrison
12 Apr 2011
Embracing the #MeToo Movement
#MeToo has quickly caught wind as a widespread movement that sheds light on the prevalence of sexual assault and harassment,…
18 Sep 2019
Supreme Court to Review Definition of “Unjust” Dismissals for Federal Employers
In February, we wrote about a decision by the Federal Court of Appeal in Wilson v Atomic Energy Limited (see our earlier…
23 Jul 2015
Make Sure Pre-Employment Screening is Complete Before they Start
A recent decision of the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the “Tribunal”), Hussey v. Big Brothers Big Sisters of Peterborough Incorporated (“BBBS”), is…
29 Jan 2013
Appellate Court Finds that CERB is not Deductible from Wrongful Dismissal Damages
By Jeremy Schwartz and Haadi Malik In 2020, the Federal Government introduced the Canada Emergency Response Benefit (“CERB”), which was…
28 Dec 2022
Proposed Family Caregiver Leave goes through Second Reading
Bill 30, An Act to Amend the Employment Standards Act, 2000 in respect of family caregiver leave, went through its second…
27 Feb 2012
Terra Firma No More: Supreme Court Changes the Ground Rules on Contracts
By: Jeremy D. Schwartz and Frank B. Portman The recent Supreme Court decision in Sattva Capital Corp v Creston Moly Corp …
29 Sep 2014
201701 Quarterly HR Law Webinar 01: Use of Discipline Records for Just Cause
Frank discusses how to best ensure you may rely on disciplinary records to prove just cause
11 Sep 2021
It’s Party Time: Planning a Safe and Liability Free Office Holiday Party
As we roll into December, many employers will be hosting an office holiday party for their employees. While these events…
29 Nov 2011