The Ontario Superior Court has ruled that an employee who continued to work for 15 months following a change in his terms and conditions of employment had not condoned the change and could claim damages for constructive dismissal. Read more about this surprising decision and key lessons for employers to learn in our Latest Update.
Jeremy D. Schwartz / About Author
Related Posts
Constructively Dismissed Employee Entitled to Bonus Despite Plan Language?
By: Landon Young There have been a number of cases in recent years considering whether dismissed employees are entitled to awards…
03 Nov 2020
Supreme Court to Review Definition of “Unjust” Dismissals for Federal Employers
In February, we wrote about a decision by the Federal Court of Appeal in Wilson v Atomic Energy Limited (see our earlier…
23 Jul 2015
Holiday Webinar 3: Harassment
Jeremy Schwartz discusses how to avoid and address workplace sexual harassment.
21 Dec 2016
Appeal Court Finds Compensation for Loss During Notice Period Trumps Shareholders’ Agreement
A recent decision by the British Columbia Court of Appeal highlights the importance of carefully crafting written employment agreements whenever shares are…
11 Jul 2013
Reporting Bad Conduct to Regulator Defamed Ex-Employee
The Court of Appeal recently confirmed that an employer defamed an ex-employee when the employer filed a false report with…
04 Dec 2018
Ontario Court Confirms that Unwanted Management is not a Constructive Dismissal
An increasingly common theme in wrongful dismissal actions are employee claims that an employer’s allegedly heavy-handed and insensitive management constitutes…
05 Nov 2018
Registration now Open for our 26th Annual Employers’ Conference
Don’t Miss our 26th Annual Employers’ Conference, Labour & Employment Law Update 2012. Register Early! Topics Include: A Terminated Employee’s…
05 Sep 2012
Keeping the Offer on the Table Essential to Mitigation Defence
Corporate restructuring is often accompanied by lawsuits by jilted employees claiming constructive dismissal. In a recent case, the Ontario Court…
26 May 2014
Ambiguity Killed the Termination Clause
The Ontario Superior Court recently struck down a termination clause in an employment agreement because of a seemingly minor ambiguity….
20 Nov 2017
Court of Appeal Rules on Employers’ Obligations to Protect Employees from Harassment and Violence when they are Away from the Workplace
In a recent decision, the Ontario Court of Appeal upheld a lower court’s ruling that a citizen’s harassing behaviour toward…
19 Sep 2017
Taking a Hard Line on Termination Entitlements Ends Up Costing More
In a recent Court of Appeal Decision, Elsegood v Cambridge Spring Services, the Court awarded common law damages to an employee…
09 Jan 2012
Workers can Simultaneously Receive WSIB LOE Benefits and ESA Termination Pay
A recent WSIAT decision considered the question of the impact of payments received by a worker receiving loss of earnings benefits upon…
24 Apr 2014
Stress Claim Tsunami: New Approach to WSIB Stress Claims
Ryan Conlin and Jeremy Schwartz discuss a landmark WSIAT decision which held sections of the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act…
29 May 2014
Court of Appeal Gives Mark-Fabricating Teacher an “F”
When is a single, serious instance of misconduct just cause for termination, particularly for a long-service employee? In Fernandes v. Peel…
22 Jun 2016
Putting on the Brakes: The Limits of the Common Employer Doctrine
One of the more deceptively complex questions in some cases can be: Who is the employer? Many businesses and organizations…
10 Jun 2016