Frank Portman discusses a recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision which greatly increased the scope of general and other damages awarded in a wrongful dismissal action.
Related Posts
Would it be a constructive dismissal to refuse to pay an employee the third of a million dollars you owe…
A recent decision, the Court of Appeal, Mady Development Corp. v. Rossetto, clarified an employee’s entitlement to bonuses who has breached…
In a past Stringer Update, Releases Protect Employers from Human Rights Complaints, we emphasized the importance of having terminated employees sign…
Employers are still wrestling with the consequences of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision on the random drug and alcohol testing…
In this webinar, Ryan Conlin and Landon Young provided guidance for employers on how to respond to the legal challenges…
After 19 years of protracted litigation, the Human Rights Tribunal of Alberta has now awarded a former employee of Mobil…
By: Frank Portman Since 2008, Courts have wrestled with wrongful dismissal claims in which employees make claims of entitlements…
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice has refused to permit a group of former Allstate Insurance employees to sue Allstate…
The Ontario Labour Relations Board (“OLRB”) recently made an important decision which may represent a significant shift in how it…
The Court of Appeal recently confirmed that an employer defamed an ex-employee when the employer filed a false report with…
By Landon Young Do employers have a general duty to act honestly and in good faith when dealing with their…
The claim was filed 28 years ago by female employees of Canada Post with the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (the…
Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act: What Employers Need to Know Now – Jessica Young
B.C. Premier John Horgan announced earlier this month that the province will reinstate its Human Rights Commission. Like Ontario, B.C. currently has…
By: Ryan Conlin & Frank Portman A recent case from Ontario’s Human Rights Tribunal is a stark reminder of how…

