Frank Portman discusses a recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision which greatly increased the scope of general and other damages awarded in a wrongful dismissal action.
Related Posts
Jessica Young discusses recent enforcement activities under the new Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA)
Kelly McDermott and Jeremy Schwartz Effective July 1, 2010, the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario has made significant changes to…
As work patterns change in the modern era, the line between independent contractor and employee can often become blurry. A…
In Lancia v. Park Dentistry, the Ontario Superior Court confirmed that employers can change the fundamental terms of an employee’s employment,…
Most people have received (or sent) a “pocket-dial”, which is an unintentional cell phone call that is made by a…
Employers often avoid making significant, compliance-oriented changes for fear that employees will discover their rights have been violated for years…
By: Jeremy Schwartz and Frank Portman A recent French language decision from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice indicates that…
Supreme Court Allows Employees to “Double-Up” on Pregnancy and Parental Benefits A regular point of contention between unions and employers…
Contracts of all kinds often fall apart over relatively minor details, despite the parties’ agreement on the majority of issues. …
In a unique set of circumstances, the Ontario Superior Court recently found that changes to an employment contract which benefited…
WSIB Return to Work Decisions: Are they Binding on the Human Rights Tribunal? – Ryan Conlin
In another twist in the rapidly developing area of family status discrimination law, the Federal Court of Appeal recently released…
By: Jeremy Schwartz & Frank Portman We have written before that heightened fears of US-sized punitive damage awards in employment law decisions…
The Psychological Health and Safety in the Workplace – Prevention, promotion and guidance to staged implementation (the “Standard”) was released by the…
Frank discusses how to best ensure you may rely on disciplinary records to prove just cause

