Ryan Conlin of Stringer LLP discusses recent jurisprudence concerning random drug and alcohol testing in Canada (post-Irving).
Related Posts
Supreme Court Allows Employees to “Double-Up” on Pregnancy and Parental Benefits A regular point of contention between unions and employers…
Hypothetical Standards: Human Rights Tribunal finds Police Liable for Racism – Jeremy Schwartz
By Ryan Conlin and Jeremy Schwartz It’s important not to draw a line in the sand too close to the…
Frank Portman discusses the implications of the recent Supreme Court of Canada decision that the right to strike is protected…
The integration of workplace violence and harassment protections into occupational health and safety legislation has been a theme in Canada…
An injured worker has succeeded in a human rights application against the Workplace Safety Insurance Board (“WSIB”). The case related to a…
Stringer LLP and First Reference are proud to host the 16th Annual Ontario Employment Law Conference in Mississauga. We invite business owners and…
Canadian employers have been confronted with a veritable ocean of new government programs, which are designed to help weather the…
Significant Changes to the Human Rights Tribunal’s Rules – Kelly McDermott and Jeremy Schwartz
The law is clear that an employer is required to accommodate employees with a “disability” up to the point of…
Ryan Conlin discusses the potentially watershed decision in R. v. Roofing Medics, in which the court commented that more personal…
A critical element of the health and safety regime in any workplace that employs heavy machinery is the presence of…
By Ryan J. Conlin and Jeremy D. Schwartz The Ontario Government has made a number of significant changes to labour…
A recent case from the Ontario Court of Justice suggests that workplace policies can be a significant component in determining…
Ontario’s Divisional Court has overturned a decision by the Ontario Labour Relations Board (the “OLRB”), in which the OLRB took…

