Ryan Conlin of Stringer LLP discusses recent jurisprudence concerning random drug and alcohol testing in Canada (post-Irving).
Related Posts
The Ontario Human Rights Code (the “Code”) was recently amended to add “gender identity or gender expression” as a ground of discrimination….
In OPSEU v. Ontario et. al., Ontario’s Divisional Court recently upheld an arbitrator’s ruling to dismiss 22 (grouped) grievances over fault-based…
By Ryan Conlin and Jeremy Schwartz Can a supervisor be found criminally negligent when he knowingly allows a worker to…
Regular readers of our blogs and updates may recall that the Ontario Government introduced Bill 160 on March 3, 2011, which proposed a number…
The ongoing flare-up of the ebola virus is currently front page news. Notwithstanding that as of the time of this…
One of the most interesting questions that arose after the Bill C-45 amendments to the Criminal Code, is whether a defendant…
Amanda Boyce discusses accommodation obligations for non-Christian observers.
In a recent decision, the Ontario Court of Appeal upheld a lower court’s ruling that a citizen’s harassing behaviour toward…
The law in Canada regarding random drug and alcohol testing has been inconsistent for some time, with the Alberta and…
The “day of application” test has been utilized by the Ontario Labour Relations Board (“Board”) in construction industry certification applications…
Significant Changes to the Human Rights Tribunal’s Rules – Kelly McDermott and Jeremy Schwartz
In the wake of the Divisional Court’s decision in the Hamilton-Wentworth District School Board v Fair, human rights damages have been…
In 2020, employers were faced with unprecedented legal challenges brought on by the pandemic. Meanwhile, the courts and tribunals issued…
By: Ryan Conlin and Amanda Boyce Employers across the province are likely aware that they have a duty to take…
The Ontario Labour Relations Board (the “Board”) has issued a landmark decision which clears the path for Foodora couriers to…

