Ryan Conlin of Stringer LLP discusses recent jurisprudence concerning random drug and alcohol testing in Canada (post-Irving).
Related Posts
WSIB Return to Work Decisions: Are they Binding on the Human Rights Tribunal? – Ryan Conlin
In a recent decision, the Ontario Court of Appeal upheld a lower court’s ruling that a citizen’s harassing behaviour toward…
By: Jeremy Schwartz Employers often remark, with varying degrees of intention, that they would rather close up shop than manage…
This is segment 4 of 5 from our Q3 webinar held on Thursday, October 10, “Implications of the Ontario Court of Appeal…
Jeremy Schwartz and Jessica Young recently published an article on forum shopping by disabled employees in the Lawyers Weekly: Labour & Employment…
Amanda Boyce discusses accommodation obligations for non-Christian observers.
Kelly McDermott and Jeremy Schwartz Effective July 1, 2010, the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario has made significant changes to…
By: Landon Young and Jessica Young Employee addiction is a challenging topic for HR professionals. Under Canadian human rights legislation, drug…
A recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision serves to remind employers that the presumption of provincial jurisdiction over labour relations…
Frank Portman discusses occupational health and safety regulations, as applicable to employer social events.
Supreme Court Allows Employees to “Double-Up” on Pregnancy and Parental Benefits A regular point of contention between unions and employers…
The Ontario Labour Relations Board (“OLRB”) recently made an important decision which may represent a significant shift in how it…
There has been a great deal of discussion and litigation across the country about the extent to which OH&S legislation…
By Ryan J. Conlin and Jeremy D. Schwartz The Ontario Government has made a number of significant changes to labour…
By Jeff Murray and Jeremy Schwartz Operating as a unionized, construction contractor in Ontario means navigating a maze of overlapping,…