Frank Portman discusses a recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision which greatly increased the scope of general and other damages awarded in a wrongful dismissal action.
Related Posts
The claim was filed 28 years ago by female employees of Canada Post with the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (the…
In the second quarter of 2014, the Ministry of Labour conducted an enforcement “blitz,” targeting companies in several sectors with intern…
By: Ryan J. Conlin and Jeremy D. Schwartz Historically, workers’ compensation law placed a highly restrictive definition on traumatic mental…
Ryan Conlin and Jeremy Schwartz discuss Bill 146 and the potential impact on employers.
Date: September 8, 2023 A New Brunswick court has rejected a supervisor’s attempt to blame his criminal non-compliance with OHS…
The Ontario Superior Court has ruled that an employee who continued to work for 15 months following a change in…
Allison Taylor discusses progressive discipline and termination for employee misconduct.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board (“OLRB”) recently made an important decision which may represent a significant shift in how it…
Compliance with the new Employment Standard under AODA – Jessica Young
A recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision dealt a blow to employers’ ability to credit employee mitigation efforts and income…
By: Jeremy Schwartz and Daniel Gaspar On October 2, 2020, Federal Bill C-4, An Act relating to certain measures in response…
Controlling Costs in Defending Human Rights Complaints – Joe Morrison
Alberta Human Rights Tribunal Awards Employee $650,000 – Kelly McDermott
Ryan Conlin of Stringer LLP discusses recent jurisprudence concerning random drug and alcohol testing in Canada (post-Irving).
A well-drafted contract protects not only the company but also its employees and senior personnel. In a recent decision, Richards v….

