Frank Portman discusses a recent, significant decision from the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario concerning remedies and mental illness in the workplace.
Related Posts
Allison Taylor explains the unfavourable result of a recent judicial review decision in Alberta concerning family status discrimination.
Most employers are likely familiar with the WSIB return to work process which often involves a WSIB employee attending at…
The Alberta Court of Queen’s bench recently reviewed the arbitrator’s decision in SMS Equipment, a case on which we have written before (see…
After 19 years of protracted litigation, the Human Rights Tribunal of Alberta has now awarded a former employee of Mobil…
Alberta Human Rights Tribunal Awards Employee $650,000 – Kelly McDermott
Canadian employers have been confronted with a veritable ocean of new government programs, which are designed to help weather the…
It is a good practice for employers to have employees sign a full and final release when their employment is…
After 19 years of protracted litigation, the Human Rights Tribunal of Alberta has now awarded a former employee of Mobil…
The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario has heard many cases brought by injured workers against the Workplace Safety and Insurance…
In a recent application to the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario, the Tribunal found that an employer facing an economic…
In British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola, a decision released in October 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada found that…
The Alberta Court of Queen’s bench recently reviewed the arbitrator’s decision in SMS Equipment, a case on which we have written before (see…
Ryan Conlin of Stringer LLP discusses recent jurisprudence concerning random drug and alcohol testing in Canada (post-Irving).
Jessica Young discusses a recent record setting human rights damages award.
Jessica Young explains the inherent risks associated with “encouraging” employees to retire.

