The Boyce decision establishes that at least in some instances injured workers are free to attempt to concurrently pursue Human Rights Code remedies against their employer even if the WSIB has ruled in the employer’s favour with respect to whether work is suitable
Parador Support / About Author
Related Posts
The Road Back Safety and Employment Law Considerations for Re Opening the Workplace
In this webinar, Ryan Conlin and Landon Young provided guidance for employers on how to respond to the legal challenges…
02 Jun 2020
Human Rights Tribunal Finds that WSIB Discriminated Against an Injured Worker for Refusing to Provide Direct Deposit of Benefit Payments (Demo)
An injured worker has succeeded in a human rights application against the Workplace Safety Insurance Board (“WSIB”). The case related to a…
26 Nov 2012
Vaccine Mandates: The Courts and Arbitrators are Weighing In (Demo)
Date: Dec 06, 2021 Vaccine mandates have been legally and politically controversial in Canada and around the world. We are…
06 Dec 2021
2020Q1 Complimentary Quarterly HR-Law Webinar (Demo)
During this edition of Stringer LLP’s complimentary Quarterly HR-Law Webinar series, broadcast on Monday, January 20, 2020, Ryan Conlin, Jeremy Schwartz and Erika Montisano discussed…
20 Jan 2020
Divisional Court Clarifies Test for a Poisonous Work Environment
When employees allege harassment in human rights complaints, they often refer to the creation of a “poisoned work environment.” A…
16 Jan 2015
Alberta Human Rights Tribunal Awards Employee $650,000 – Kelly McDermott (Demo)
Alberta Human Rights Tribunal Awards Employee $650,000 – Kelly McDermott
09 Sep 2010
Zero Tolerance Policies and Medicinal Marijuana (Demo)
Marijuana will soon be legal for recreational use nationwide and many employers are scrambling to respond to the challenges this…
28 Sep 2018
BC Labour Relations Board waters down Irving Pulp (Demo)
Employers are still wrestling with the consequences of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision on the random drug and alcohol testing…
26 May 2014
Ontario Human Rights Tribunal Opening the Door to Duplicative Litigation? (Demo)
Since the Supreme Court decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola (“Figliola”), the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the…
11 Sep 2013
Navigating the Attendance Management Minefield in the COVID era
On September 4, 2020, Ryan and Jeremy discussed the legal tightrope in terms of employee attendance management, that employers must…
04 Sep 2020
Human Rights Tribunal Heeding Clear Direction from Supreme Court (Demo)
In British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola, a decision released in October 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada found that…
25 Jan 2012
When is an Owner an Employee?
When is an owner also an “employee”? The Supreme Court of Canada recently rendered a decision on the question of…
24 Jun 2014
Alphabet Soup – Navigating the Waters of SUBs, CERBS, Layoffs, Work-Sharing and Subsidies in the Corona Virus Emergency (Demo)
Canadian employers have been confronted with a veritable ocean of new government programs, which are designed to help weather the…
16 Apr 2020
What mental capacity is required to sign a release? (Demo)
In a past Stringer Update, Releases Protect Employers from Human Rights Complaints, we emphasized the importance of having terminated employees sign…
11 Oct 2012
What is a Reprisal under the Human Rights Code? (Demo)
By: Ryan Conlin & Frank Portman A recent case from Ontario’s Human Rights Tribunal is a stark reminder of how…
08 Apr 2014