The Boyce decision establishes that at least in some instances injured workers are free to attempt to concurrently pursue Human Rights Code remedies against their employer even if the WSIB has ruled in the employer’s favour with respect to whether work is suitable
Related Posts
Even as the world grapples with variants and what appears to be the fourth wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, employers…
Employers are often unsure whether they have the right to ask for doctor’s notes (i.e. medical evidence) to justify employee…
A recent Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario decision confirms that family status protection may require employers to accommodate employees’ sporadic…
Even as the world grapples with variants and what appears to be the fourth wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, employers…
When is an owner also an “employee”? The Supreme Court of Canada recently rendered a decision on the question of…
The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the “Tribunal”) recently held that it is not discriminatory for employers to treat disabled…
It is a good practice for employers to have employees sign a full and final release when their employment is…
On September 4, 2020, Ryan and Jeremy discussed the legal tightrope in terms of employee attendance management, that employers must…
Hypothetical Standards: Human Rights Tribunal finds Police Liable for Racism – Jeremy Schwartz
Obese Resident Awarded Preferred Parking Space – Jeremy D. Schwartz
Discrimination Case Reversed by the Courts: Are we Entering a New Era? – Allison Taylor
Releases Protect Employers from Human Rights Complaints – Landon Young and Jessica Young
Ryan Conlin and Frank Portman discuss the disturbing trend of increasingly large general damages awards in human rights litigation.
In the wake of the Divisional Court’s decision in the Hamilton-Wentworth District School Board v Fair, human rights damages have been…
Ryan Conlin and Jeremy Schwartz discuss a landmark WSIAT decision which held sections of the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act…

