The Boyce decision establishes that at least in some instances injured workers are free to attempt to concurrently pursue Human Rights Code remedies against their employer even if the WSIB has ruled in the employer’s favour with respect to whether work is suitable
Related Posts
Amanda Boyce discusses accommodation obligations for non-Christian observers.
Significant Changes to the Human Rights Tribunal’s Rules – Kelly McDermott and Jeremy Schwartz
Supreme Court Allows Employees to “Double-Up” on Pregnancy and Parental Benefits A regular point of contention between unions and employers…
Jessica Young explains the inherent risks associated with “encouraging” employees to retire.
Discrimination Case Reversed by the Courts: Are we Entering a New Era? – Allison Taylor
Contracts of all kinds often fall apart over relatively minor details, despite the parties’ agreement on the majority of issues. …
In a recent case, Peel Law Association v. Pieters, the Divisional Court overturned a decision of the Human Rights Tribunal finding…
The law is clear that an employer is required to accommodate employees with a “disability” up to the point of…
Employers are still wrestling with the consequences of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision on the random drug and alcohol testing…
In 2020, employers were faced with unprecedented legal challenges brought on by the pandemic. Meanwhile, the courts and tribunals issued…
Date: Dec 06, 2021 Vaccine mandates have been legally and politically controversial in Canada and around the world. We are…
This is segment 1 of 5 from our Q3 webinar held on Thursday, October 10, “Upcoming AODA Obligations – What You Need…
Jeremy Schwartz discusses how to avoid and address workplace sexual harassment.
In this webinar, Ryan Conlin and Landon Young provided guidance for employers on how to respond to the legal challenges…
#MeToo has quickly caught wind as a widespread movement that sheds light on the prevalence of sexual assault and harassment,…

