The Boyce decision establishes that at least in some instances injured workers are free to attempt to concurrently pursue Human Rights Code remedies against their employer even if the WSIB has ruled in the employer’s favour with respect to whether work is suitable
Related Posts
Allison Taylor discusses recent decisions from the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario suggesting a disturbing trend in that tribunal permitting…
Supreme Court Allows Employees to “Double-Up” on Pregnancy and Parental Benefits A regular point of contention between unions and employers…
The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the “Tribunal”) recently held that it is not discriminatory for employers to treat disabled…
Perhaps now more than ever before, the lawyers at Stringer LLP have been deeply engaged, supporting clients who face significant,…
WSIB Return to Work Decisions: Are they Binding on the Human Rights Tribunal? – Ryan Conlin
Significant Changes to the Human Rights Tribunal’s Rules – Kelly McDermott and Jeremy Schwartz
In a recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada, the Court dealt with the issue of awarding legal costs…
Jessica Young discusses a recent record setting human rights damages award.
Effective Management of Long-Term Disabled Employees: How to Navigate the Legal Minefield. Please join us at the Delta Toronto Airport…
Employers have a duty to accommodate employees with disabilities to the point of undue hardship, including facilitating the return to…
Marijuana will soon be legal for recreational use nationwide and many employers are scrambling to respond to the challenges this…
Allison Taylor discusses progressive discipline and termination for employee misconduct.
Releases Protect Employers from Human Rights Complaints – Landon Young and Jessica Young
By: Jeremy Schwartz and Frank Portman We have written before on the decision of the Federal Court of Appeal in Johnstone…
The legalization of marijuana for recreational use will have a profound impact on workplaces across the country. This Webinar examines…

