In a recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada, the Court dealt with the issue of awarding legal costs in a human rights complaint. This decision provides a good reminder to employers and employees of the significance of legal costs in such proceedings. Read about this decision and the practical implications in our Latest Update.
Parador Support / About Author
Related Posts
Alberta Human Rights Tribunal Awards Employee $650,000 – Kelly McDermott (Demo)
Alberta Human Rights Tribunal Awards Employee $650,000 – Kelly McDermott
09 Sep 2010
2016 Q2 HR-Law Webinar Part 4: Random Drug and Alcohol Testing
Jeff Murray discusses a recent Alberta Court of Queens Bench decision that overturned an arbitration panel’s finding that Suncor’s random…
19 Jul 2016
Human Rights Code Amended to Include Gender Identity
The Ontario Human Rights Code (the “Code”) was recently amended to add “gender identity or gender expression” as a ground of discrimination….
31 Jul 2012
2014 Q3 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 3: Watershed Human Rights Decision
Frank Portman discusses a recent, significant decision from the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario concerning remedies and mental illness in…
14 Oct 2014
Ontario Human Rights Tribunal Opening the Door to Duplicative Litigation?
Since the Supreme Court decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola (“Figliola”), the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the…
11 Sep 2013
What is the next step in AODA compliance?
The AODA Employment Standard deadlines are not as far away as they may seem. The Employment Standard is one of…
26 May 2014
Significant Changes to the Human Rights Tribunal’s Rules
Kelly McDermott and Jeremy Schwartz Effective July 1, 2010, the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario has made significant changes to…
15 Jul 2010
Then Now Next: Ontario Government To Introduce Pay Transparency Legislation (Demo)
Premier Kathleen Wynne announced this morning that the Ontario government would introduce new legislation aimed at increasing pay transparency as…
06 Mar 2018
Addiction without compulsion: no defence to serious misconduct using the “hybrid” approach
The law on addiction has evolved over the years in arbitral jurisprudence. Earlier decisions treated illness as a mitigating factor…
03 Mar 2017
Human Rights Tribunal Rules on Family Status Protection for Infrequent and Unexpected Childcare Obligations (Demo)
A recent Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario decision confirms that family status protection may require employers to accommodate employees’ sporadic…
20 Apr 2016
Federal Court of Appeal Revises Test for Family Status Discrimination
In another twist in the rapidly developing area of family status discrimination law, the Federal Court of Appeal recently released…
20 May 2014
Significant Changes to the Human Rights Tribunal’s Rules (Demo)
Kelly McDermott and Jeremy Schwartz Effective July 1, 2010, the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario has made significant changes to…
15 Jul 2010
Drug Dependency and Denial: Alberta Court of Appeal Rules Denial not a Shield to Discipline (Demo)
By: Landon Young and Jessica Young Employee addiction is a challenging topic for HR professionals. Under Canadian human rights legislation, drug…
27 Aug 2015
Workplace Investigations – Will Yours Survive Tribunal Scrutiny? (Demo)
Workplace investigations have been an increasingly important topic for HR Professionals in the past few years. Employers have a duty…
28 Jul 2015
Human Rights Tribunal Discourages Unnecessary Naming of Personal Respondents in Applications
In Sterling v Wendy’s Restaurant, the applicants (a former Wendy’s employee and his wife), named 14 personal respondents, who were members…
07 Sep 2011