In a recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada, the Court dealt with the issue of awarding legal costs in a human rights complaint. This decision provides a good reminder to employers and employees of the significance of legal costs in such proceedings. Read about this decision and the practical implications in our Latest Update.
Parador Support / About Author
Related Posts
Office Holiday Parties – The Fine Print (Demo)
An office holiday party is a great time to unwind as a team and encourage a sense of community. Unfortunately,…
14 Dec 2012
Avoid Procedural Missteps when Accommodating Mental Disabilities in the Workplace
The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario has heard many cases brought by injured workers against the Workplace Safety and Insurance…
25 Aug 2017
BC Labour Relations Board waters down Irving Pulp
Employers are still wrestling with the consequences of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision on the random drug and alcohol testing…
26 May 2014
Alberta Human Rights Tribunal Awards Five Years of Back Pay and Reinstatement (Demo)
In a decision that will surely draw attention across the country, the Alberta Human Rights Tribunal has awarded an employee 5 years…
21 Feb 2013
Human Rights Tribunal finds undue hardship test met (Demo)
In a recent application to the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario, the Tribunal found that an employer facing an economic…
17 Oct 2011
Releases Protect Employers From Human Rights Complaints
It is a good practice for employers to have employees sign a full and final release when their employment is…
15 Aug 2011
Failure to mitigate reduces damages in Human Rights claim
In the wake of the Divisional Court’s decision in the Hamilton-Wentworth District School Board v Fair, human rights damages have been…
07 Nov 2014
British Columbia to Reinstate Human Rights Commission (Demo)
B.C. Premier John Horgan announced earlier this month that the province will reinstate its Human Rights Commission. Like Ontario, B.C. currently has…
17 Aug 2017
Allison Taylor Speaks to Canadian @HRReporter About Managing Disabled Employees
Tweet This Post Posted on Wednesday, July 6th, 2011 at 11:24 am Categories: Uncategorized.
16 Jul 2011
Human Rights Tribunal Discourages Unnecessary Naming of Personal Respondents in Applications
In Sterling v Wendy’s Restaurant, the applicants (a former Wendy’s employee and his wife), named 14 personal respondents, who were members…
07 Sep 2011
Human Rights Code Amended to Include Gender Identity
The Ontario Human Rights Code (the “Code”) was recently amended to add “gender identity or gender expression” as a ground of discrimination….
31 Jul 2012
Accommodating scent sensitivities in the workplace
Employers must accommodate employees with disabilities to the point of undue hardship under the Ontario Human Rights Code. The accommodation of…
15 Oct 2012
It Takes Two to Tango: Superior Court Rules on Employees’ Duty to Facilitate in the Accommodation Process
Employers have a duty to accommodate employees with disabilities to the point of undue hardship, including facilitating the return to…
16 May 2016
Long and Winding Road Managing Emerging Employment and OHS Issues in the COVID Transition
Employers have made their plans; they’ve hunkered down; and they’ve sheltered in place. As we traverse the long and winding…
11 Dec 2020
Zero Tolerance Policies and Medicinal Marijuana
Marijuana will soon be legal for recreational use nationwide and many employers are scrambling to respond to the challenges this…
28 Sep 2018