In a recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada, the Court dealt with the issue of awarding legal costs in a human rights complaint. This decision provides a good reminder to employers and employees of the significance of legal costs in such proceedings. Read about this decision and the practical implications in our Latest Update.
Parador Support / About Author
Related Posts
Ontario Human Rights Tribunal Opening the Door to Duplicative Litigation?
Since the Supreme Court decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola (“Figliola”), the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the…
11 Sep 2013
Human Rights Tribunal Heeding Clear Direction from Supreme Court (Demo)
In British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola, a decision released in October 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada found that…
25 Jan 2012
Supreme Court Allows Employees to “Double-Up” on Pregnancy and Parental Benefits
Supreme Court Allows Employees to “Double-Up” on Pregnancy and Parental Benefits A regular point of contention between unions and employers…
08 Dec 2014
Gloves Come Off: Sky High Damages in Human Rights Cases
By: Ryan Conlin and Frank Portman Human Rights Tribunals across the country have been issuing damage awards which have raised…
05 Jun 2014
Holiday Webinar 3: Harassment (Demo)
Jeremy Schwartz discusses how to avoid and address workplace sexual harassment.
21 Dec 2016
Blame the Lawyer? Drawing Best Practices for In-House Counsel from the Jurisprudence
By: Jeremy Schwartz and Amanda Boyce In-house counsel is often the unsung hero of a legal saga, having guided their…
14 Sep 2016
Divisional Court provides Guidance as to What Constitutes a Prima Facie Case of Discrimination (Demo)
In a recent case, Peel Law Association v. Pieters, the Divisional Court overturned a decision of the Human Rights Tribunal finding…
06 Mar 2012
2014 Q4 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 4: Human Rights Forum Shopping
Jeremy Schwartz discusses the disturbing trend of employees forum shopping in human rights matters, and a recent HRTO decision which…
21 Jan 2015
Human Rights Tribunal Rules on Family Status Protection for Infrequent and Unexpected Childcare Obligations (Demo)
A recent Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario decision confirms that family status protection may require employers to accommodate employees’ sporadic…
20 Apr 2016
Back to Basics: HRTO Follows Figliola and Refuses to Allow Relitigation of WSIB Claim (Demo)
In 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v Figliola (“Figliola”). The Figliola decision addressed the…
05 Dec 2014
2016 Q2 HR-Law Webinar Part 3: ONCA Upholds Landmark Retroactive Loss Award
Jeremy Schwartz discusses a recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision that upheld a landmark retroactive loss of earnings award from…
19 Jul 2016
Think You Suffered Family Status Discrimination? First Things First – Were You Employed in Ontario or B.C.? (Demo)
The law governing family status discrimination under human rights legislation is unsettled and varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. A new…
16 Apr 2019
Human Rights Tribunal finds undue hardship test met
In a recent application to the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario, the Tribunal found that an employer facing an economic…
17 Oct 2011
Human Rights Tribunal Finds Discrimination in Request for Medical Information
In Thompson v. 1552754 Ontario Inc., the applicant was employed as a counter person at the respondent’s coffee shop. The applicant…
24 May 2013