Frank Portman discusses a recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision which greatly increased the scope of general and other damages awarded in a wrongful dismissal action.
Related Posts
Don’t miss our comprehensive, half-day training seminar at the Sheraton Toronto Airport on Thursday, September 22.
Amanda discusses the law on bonus eligibility during the reasonable notice period
This is segment 2 of 5 from our Q3 webinar held on Thursday, October 10, “Recent Developments in Summary Judgement Motions”
Most employers are likely familiar with the WSIB return to work process which often involves a WSIB employee attending at…
When a company purchases another business, it is important to consider the legal implications respecting the status of employees. The…
To be enforceable, non-competition agreements must, as a general rule, be reasonable and unambiguous in terms of their geographic scope,…
WSIB Return to Work Decisions: Are they Binding on the Human Rights Tribunal? – Ryan Conlin
Jeremy Schwartz discusses the disturbing trend of employees forum shopping in human rights matters, and a recent HRTO decision which…
Jeff Murray discusses a recent landmark contract decision from the Supreme Court of Canada
By: Jeremy Schwartz and Frank Portman We have written before on the decision of the Federal Court of Appeal in Johnstone…
A recent decision of the Ontario Labour Relations Board, Sabbah v. University of Ottawa, demonstrates how mistakes in presenting new employment contracts…
In a recent Court of Appeal Decision, Elsegood v Cambridge Spring Services, the Court awarded common law damages to an employee…
Ryan Conlin discusses recent changes to the WSIB return to work
By Landon Young Do employers have a general duty to act honestly and in good faith when dealing with their…
A recent WSIAT decision considered the question of the impact of payments received by a worker receiving loss of earnings benefits upon…