Frank Portman discusses a recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision which greatly increased the scope of general and other damages awarded in a wrongful dismissal action.
Related Posts
By: Jeremy Schwartz and Jessica Young Recently, the Ontario Government provided new details regarding the Ontario Retirement Pension Plan (the “ORPP”). The…
Anyone involved in the human resources side of management will be familiar with the concept of notice periods for terminated…
Jessica Young discusses recent enforcement activities under the new Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA)
Navigating the intricate legal environment of a merger, acquisition, takeover or other corporate restructuring can be difficult enough without the…
Most people have received (or sent) a “pocket-dial”, which is an unintentional cell phone call that is made by a…
Employers are often told by their lawyers that satisfying a Court that there is “just cause” to terminate an employee…
In Lancia v. Park Dentistry, the Ontario Superior Court confirmed that employers can change the fundamental terms of an employee’s employment,…
The Court of Appeal recently confirmed that an employer defamed an ex-employee when the employer filed a false report with…
Landon Young discusses recent case law on the enforceability of ESA termination provisions.
Take It or Leave It: How NOT to Change Terms in an Employment Contract – Greg McGinnis and Jeremy Schwartz
One of the more deceptively complex questions in some cases can be: Who is the employer? Many businesses and organizations…
We’ve had a year to digest significant changes to labour and employment legislation, and the courts and tribunals continue to…
Employers are still wrestling with the consequences of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision on the random drug and alcohol testing…
Jessica Young explains the inherent risks associated with “encouraging” employees to retire.
Tweet This Post Posted on Wednesday, July 6th, 2011 at 11:24 am Categories: Uncategorized.

