Ryan Conlin of Stringer LLP discusses recent jurisprudence concerning random drug and alcohol testing in Canada (post-Irving).
Related Posts
The Crown has decided to seek permission (referred to as “leave”) to appeal the $200,000 fine imposed against Metron Construction…
The Canadian law on workplace violence and harassment continues to develop, particularly in relation to the duty to investigate. Employers…
The law on addiction has evolved over the years in arbitral jurisprudence. Earlier decisions treated illness as a mitigating factor…
The law has become increasingly sensitive to the need for the protection of personal information from public disclosure. This is…
Do you have a policy prohibiting your employees from smoking when they drive alone in a company vehicle? If not,…
A revised Bill 160 was passed on June 1st. Notable changes to the Bill include an increase in the role…
Significant Changes to the Human Rights Tribunal’s Rules – Kelly McDermott and Jeremy Schwartz
One of the most complex issues under Ontario OH&S law relates to determining which party on a construction project is…
Date: Mar 04. 2022 The Omicron wave appears to be receding and there is cautious optimism that the worst of…
By: Jeremy Schwartz and Frank Portman We have written before on the decision of the Federal Court of Appeal in Johnstone…
By: Ryan Conlin & Jeremy Schwartz Hire a contractor and you may inadvertently face liability as a “constructor” under Ontario’s Occupational…
Controlling Costs in Defending Human Rights Complaints – Joe Morrison
Employers charged with violating the Occupational Health and Safety Act (Act) can escape conviction by proving they exercised due diligence, often referred…
In April, we blogged that the Supreme Court of Canada had granted leave to appeal a decision regarding the random alcohol testing…
By: Ryan J. Conlin Employers across Ontario are likely breathing a sigh of relief. The Court of Appeal just released…

