Frank Portman discusses a recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision which greatly increased the scope of general and other damages awarded in a wrongful dismissal action.
Related Posts
When no work is available in a particular field, dismissed employees may undertake reasonable mitigation efforts by pursuing re-training to…
When is a single, serious instance of misconduct just cause for termination, particularly for a long-service employee? In Fernandes v. Peel…
Just cause is a difficult standard for employers to meet. In most cases, employees who are terminated from employment will…
As technology becomes more ubiquitous in the workplace, the importance of having proper policies and discipline to govern the use…
WSIB Return to Work Decisions: Are they Binding on the Human Rights Tribunal? – Ryan Conlin
Employers are often faced with the galling choice between asserting just cause for termination, and paying potentially large sums of…
Responding to Human Rights Harassment Complaints: Guidelines from the HRTO – Jeremy Schwartz
Ryan Conlin discusses recent changes to the WSIB return to work
By: Jeremy D. Schwartz and Frank B. Portman The recent Supreme Court decision in Sattva Capital Corp v Creston Moly Corp …
A recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision highlights the importance of maintaining composure – and not venting frustrations upon employees….
Date: November 27, 2023 As employers weather the storm of post-pandemic economic sluggishness, rising interest rates and an emboldened workforce,…
Employers are often told by their lawyers that satisfying a Court that there is “just cause” to terminate an employee…
The Alberta Court of Queen’s bench recently reviewed the arbitrator’s decision in SMS Equipment, a case on which we have written before (see…
The Ontario Superior Court recently found that an employee had been constructively dismissed when her employer reneged on its promise…
The Court of Appeal recently confirmed that an employer defamed an ex-employee when the employer filed a false report with…