Jeremy Schwartz discusses a recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision that upheld a landmark retroactive loss of earnings award from the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.
Related Posts
Contracts of all kinds often fall apart over relatively minor details, despite the parties’ agreement on the majority of issues. …
In 2020, employers were faced with unprecedented legal challenges brought on by the pandemic. Meanwhile, the courts and tribunals issued…
The law is clear that an employer is required to accommodate employees with a “disability” up to the point of…
Jessica Young discusses a recent record setting human rights damages award.
An office holiday party is a great time to unwind as a team and encourage a sense of community. Unfortunately,…
Releases Protect Employers from Human Rights Complaints – Landon Young and Jessica Young
It has been a year since the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola (“Figliola”). In…
Register Now! As always, our goal is to provide a concise, high-level summary of the most significant legal developments affecting…
You are an employer that has just received a harassment complaint from an employee. The complaint is against a valued…
Employers are still wrestling with the consequences of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision on the random drug and alcohol testing…
Tweet This Post Posted on Wednesday, July 6th, 2011 at 11:24 am Categories: Uncategorized.
Ryan Conlin of Stringer LLP discusses recent jurisprudence concerning random drug and alcohol testing in Canada (post-Irving).
In the wake of the Divisional Court’s decision in the Hamilton-Wentworth District School Board v Fair, human rights damages have been…
Perhaps now more than ever before, the lawyers at Stringer LLP have been deeply engaged, supporting clients who face significant,…
By: Ryan Conlin & Frank Portman In most jurisdictions in Canada, human rights legislation prohibits discrimination on the basis of…