It is a good practice for employers to have employees sign a full and final release when their employment is terminated in order to avoid future law suits arising from the employment relationship. Recent cases of the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario illustrate a trend in the jurisprudence toward dismissing human rights applications by employees who have signed a release. Read about these decisions and tips to make your release enforceable in our latest update
Jeremy D. Schwartz / About Author
Related Posts
Will this Ever End? Managing Return to Work in the Fourth Wave
Even as the world grapples with variants and what appears to be the fourth wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, employers…
24 Aug 2021
2014 Q2 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 4: FCA Establishes New Family Status Test
Allison Taylor discusses the recent Federal Court of Appeal decision which outlined a new, balanced test for family status discrimination…
23 Jul 2014
Office Holiday Parties – The Fine Print
An office holiday party is a great time to unwind as a team and encourage a sense of community. Unfortunately,…
14 Dec 2012
2020 – An HR Law Year in Review (Demo)
In 2020, employers were faced with unprecedented legal challenges brought on by the pandemic. Meanwhile, the courts and tribunals issued…
15 Jan 2021
Register Now for our 27th Annual Employers’ Conference, Labour & Employment Law Update 2013
Don’t Miss our 27th Annual Employers’ Conference: Labour & Employment Law Update 2013. Space is limited. Register Early! Topics Include:…
20 Aug 2013
2014 Q3 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 1: WSIB Return to Work
Ryan Conlin discusses recent changes to the WSIB return to work
14 Oct 2014
It Takes Two to Tango: Superior Court Rules on Employees’ Duty to Facilitate in the Accommodation Process
Employers have a duty to accommodate employees with disabilities to the point of undue hardship, including facilitating the return to…
16 May 2016
WSIB Return to Work Decisions: Are they Binding on the Human Rights Tribunal? – Ryan Conlin
WSIB Return to Work Decisions: Are they Binding on the Human Rights Tribunal? – Ryan Conlin
14 Sep 2010
Human Rights Tribunal Finds Discrimination in Request for Medical Information (Demo)
In Thompson v. 1552754 Ontario Inc., the applicant was employed as a counter person at the respondent’s coffee shop. The applicant…
24 May 2013
2016 Q2 HR-Law Webinar Part 4: Random Drug and Alcohol Testing
Jeff Murray discusses a recent Alberta Court of Queens Bench decision that overturned an arbitration panel’s finding that Suncor’s random…
19 Jul 2016
Last Call for COVID? The Latest on the Road Back
Date: Mar 04. 2022 The Omicron wave appears to be receding and there is cautious optimism that the worst of…
04 Mar 2022
Human Rights Tribunal Finds Discrimination in Request for Medical Information
In Thompson v. 1552754 Ontario Inc., the applicant was employed as a counter person at the respondent’s coffee shop. The applicant…
24 May 2013
Superior Court Applies the “Johnstone Test” for Family Status Discrimination in Wrongful Dismissal Action (Demo)
By: Jeremy Schwartz and Frank Portman We have written before on the decision of the Federal Court of Appeal in Johnstone…
04 Feb 2015
Significant Changes to the Human Rights Tribunal’s Rules (Demo)
Kelly McDermott and Jeremy Schwartz Effective July 1, 2010, the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario has made significant changes to…
15 Jul 2010
Forum Shopping a Growing Problem – Published in The Lawyers Weekly
Jeremy Schwartz and Jessica Young recently published an article on forum shopping by disabled employees in the Lawyers Weekly: Labour & Employment…
06 Mar 2012