It is a good practice for employers to have employees sign a full and final release when their employment is terminated in order to avoid future law suits arising from the employment relationship. Recent cases of the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario illustrate a trend in the jurisprudence toward dismissing human rights applications by employees who have signed a release. Read about these decisions and tips to make your release enforceable in our latest update
Jeremy D. Schwartz / About Author
Related Posts
Divisional Court Clarifies Test for a Poisonous Work Environment
When employees allege harassment in human rights complaints, they often refer to the creation of a “poisoned work environment.” A…
16 Jan 2015
Preferential Treatment for Employees with Active WSIB Claims not Discriminatory
The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the “Tribunal”) recently held that it is not discriminatory for employers to treat disabled…
25 Oct 2017
Human Rights Tribunal Rules on Family Status Protection for Infrequent and Unexpected Childcare Obligations
A recent Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario decision confirms that family status protection may require employers to accommodate employees’ sporadic…
20 Apr 2016
Blame the Lawyer? Drawing Best Practices for In-House Counsel from the Jurisprudence
By: Jeremy Schwartz and Amanda Boyce In-house counsel is often the unsung hero of a legal saga, having guided their…
14 Sep 2016
What mental capacity is required to sign a release?
In a past Stringer Update, Releases Protect Employers from Human Rights Complaints, we emphasized the importance of having terminated employees sign…
11 Oct 2012
Does Human Rights Legislation Apply to Job Ads on Facebook?
Technological advancements frequently outpace the law’s ability to respond to the challenges they create. With the click of a button,…
12 Apr 2019
COVID-19: Lessons from the HR Trenches
Perhaps now more than ever before, the lawyers at Stringer LLP have been deeply engaged, supporting clients who face significant,…
30 Jul 2020
2014 Q3 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 3: Watershed Human Rights Decision
Frank Portman discusses a recent, significant decision from the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario concerning remedies and mental illness in…
14 Oct 2014
Zero Tolerance Policies and Medicinal Marijuana
Marijuana will soon be legal for recreational use nationwide and many employers are scrambling to respond to the challenges this…
28 Sep 2018
2016 Q2 HR-Law Webinar Part 4: Random Drug and Alcohol Testing
Jeff Murray discusses a recent Alberta Court of Queens Bench decision that overturned an arbitration panel’s finding that Suncor’s random…
19 Jul 2016
Long and Winding Road Managing Emerging Employment and OHS Issues in the COVID Transition
Employers have made their plans; they’ve hunkered down; and they’ve sheltered in place. As we traverse the long and winding…
11 Dec 2020
Significant Changes to the Human Rights Tribunal’s Rules
Kelly McDermott and Jeremy Schwartz Effective July 1, 2010, the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario has made significant changes to…
15 Jul 2010
What does “Disability” Actually Mean for Accommodation Purposes?
The law is clear that an employer is required to accommodate employees with a “disability” up to the point of…
22 May 2013
Will this Ever End? Managing Return to Work in the Fourth Wave
Even as the world grapples with variants and what appears to be the fourth wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, employers…
24 Aug 2021
Early Bird Registration Now Open: 16th Annual Employment Law Conference
Stringer LLP and First Reference are proud to host the 16th Annual Ontario Employment Law Conference in Mississauga. We invite business owners and…
03 Mar 2015