It is a good practice for employers to have employees sign a full and final release when their employment is terminated in order to avoid future law suits arising from the employment relationship. Recent cases of the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario illustrate a trend in the jurisprudence toward dismissing human rights applications by employees who have signed a release. Read about these decisions and tips to make your release enforceable in our latest update
Jeremy D. Schwartz / About Author
Related Posts
Gloves Come Off: Sky High Damages in Human Rights Cases
By: Ryan Conlin and Frank Portman Human Rights Tribunals across the country have been issuing damage awards which have raised…
05 Jun 2014
When is an Owner an Employee? (Demo)
When is an owner also an “employee”? The Supreme Court of Canada recently rendered a decision on the question of…
24 Jun 2014
BC Labour Relations Board waters down Irving Pulp (Demo)
Employers are still wrestling with the consequences of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision on the random drug and alcohol testing…
26 May 2014
Gloves Come Off: Sky High Damages in Human Rights Cases (Demo)
By: Ryan Conlin and Frank Portman Human Rights Tribunals across the country have been issuing damage awards which have raised…
05 Jun 2014
Human Rights Tribunal Rules on Family Status Protection for Infrequent and Unexpected Childcare Obligations
A recent Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario decision confirms that family status protection may require employers to accommodate employees’ sporadic…
20 Apr 2016
Superior Court Applies the “Johnstone Test” for Family Status Discrimination in Wrongful Dismissal Action (Demo)
By: Jeremy Schwartz and Frank Portman We have written before on the decision of the Federal Court of Appeal in Johnstone…
04 Feb 2015
Blame the Lawyer? Drawing Best Practices for In-House Counsel from the Jurisprudence (Demo)
By: Jeremy Schwartz and Amanda Boyce In-house counsel is often the unsung hero of a legal saga, having guided their…
14 Sep 2016
Stress Claim Tsunami: New Approach to WSIB Stress Claims
Ryan Conlin and Jeremy Schwartz discuss a landmark WSIAT decision which held sections of the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act…
29 May 2014
2014 Q4 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 4: Human Rights Forum Shopping (Demo)
Jeremy Schwartz discusses the disturbing trend of employees forum shopping in human rights matters, and a recent HRTO decision which…
21 Jan 2015
Make Sure Pre-Employment Screening is Complete Before they Start (Demo)
A recent decision of the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the “Tribunal”), Hussey v. Big Brothers Big Sisters of Peterborough Incorporated (“BBBS”), is…
29 Jan 2013
Drug Dependency and Denial: Alberta Court of Appeal Rules Denial not a Shield to Discipline
By: Landon Young and Jessica Young Employee addiction is a challenging topic for HR professionals. Under Canadian human rights legislation, drug…
27 Aug 2015
2014 Q4 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 4: Human Rights Forum Shopping
Jeremy Schwartz discusses the disturbing trend of employees forum shopping in human rights matters, and a recent HRTO decision which…
21 Jan 2015
Two Kicks at the Can: Worker Allowed to Re-litigate WSIB Accommodation Dispute at the Human Rights Tribunal (Demo)
Most employers are likely familiar with the WSIB return to work process which often involves a WSIB employee attending at…
12 Nov 2013
2013 Q3 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 1: AODA Update
This is segment 1 of 5 from our Q3 webinar held on Thursday, October 10, “Upcoming AODA Obligations – What You Need…
12 Oct 2013
Solid evidentiary burden to prove constructive dismissal due to poisoned work environment (Demo)
In a recent decision, General Motors of Canada Limited v. Johnson, the Ontario Court of Appeal provided clarity on an employee’s…
14 Aug 2013