It is a good practice for employers to have employees sign a full and final release when their employment is terminated in order to avoid future law suits arising from the employment relationship. Recent cases of the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario illustrate a trend in the jurisprudence toward dismissing human rights applications by employees who have signed a release. Read about these decisions and tips to make your release enforceable in our latest update
Jeremy D. Schwartz / About Author
Related Posts
Significant Changes to the Human Rights Tribunal’s Rules – Kelly McDermott and Jeremy Schwartz (Demo)
Significant Changes to the Human Rights Tribunal’s Rules – Kelly McDermott and Jeremy Schwartz
15 Jul 2010
37th Annual Employers’ Conference
Date: November 27, 2023 As employers weather the storm of post-pandemic economic sluggishness, rising interest rates and an emboldened workforce,…
01 Dec 2023
Is the Sky Falling? Family Status Discrimination and Shift Shopping
By: Ryan Conlin & Frank Portman In most jurisdictions in Canada, human rights legislation prohibits discrimination on the basis of…
07 Mar 2014
It Takes Two to Tango: Superior Court Rules on Employees’ Duty to Facilitate in the Accommodation Process (Demo)
Employers have a duty to accommodate employees with disabilities to the point of undue hardship, including facilitating the return to…
16 May 2016
Rising Tide of Human Rights Damages (Demo)
Ryan Conlin and Frank Portman discuss the disturbing trend of increasingly large general damages awards in human rights litigation.
25 Jun 2014
WSIB RETURN TO WORK DECISIONS: ARE THEY BINDING ON THE HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL?
The Boyce decision establishes that at least in some instances injured workers are free to attempt to concurrently pursue Human…
14 Sep 2010
Releases Protect Employers from Human Rights Complaints – Landon Young and Jessica Young
Releases Protect Employers from Human Rights Complaints – Landon Young and Jessica Young
12 Aug 2011
Federal Court of Appeal Revises Test for Family Status Discrimination (Demo)
In another twist in the rapidly developing area of family status discrimination law, the Federal Court of Appeal recently released…
20 May 2014
Failure to mitigate reduces damages in Human Rights claim (Demo)
In the wake of the Divisional Court’s decision in the Hamilton-Wentworth District School Board v Fair, human rights damages have been…
07 Nov 2014
2014 Q3 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 3: Watershed Human Rights Decision
Frank Portman discusses a recent, significant decision from the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario concerning remedies and mental illness in…
14 Oct 2014
Lessons from the HR Trenches (Demo)
Perhaps now more than ever before, the lawyers at Stringer LLP have been deeply engaged, supporting clients who face significant,…
10 Sep 2021
2016 Q2 HR-Law Webinar Part 5: ONCA on General Damages
Frank Portman discusses a recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision which greatly increased the scope of general and other damages…
19 Jul 2016
Human Rights Tribunal Heeding Clear Direction from Supreme Court
In British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola, a decision released in October 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada found that…
25 Jan 2012
Accommodating scent sensitivities in the workplace (Demo)
Employers must accommodate employees with disabilities to the point of undue hardship under the Ontario Human Rights Code. The accommodation of…
15 Oct 2012
Human Rights Tribunal finds undue hardship test met (Demo)
In a recent application to the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario, the Tribunal found that an employer facing an economic…
17 Oct 2011