Jeremy Schwartz discusses a recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision that upheld a landmark retroactive loss of earnings award from the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.
Related Posts
Contracts of all kinds often fall apart over relatively minor details, despite the parties’ agreement on the majority of issues. …
Controlling Costs in Defending Human Rights Complaints – Joe Morrison
Employers have made their plans; they’ve hunkered down; and they’ve sheltered in place. As we traverse the long and winding…
By: Jeremy Schwartz and Amanda Boyce In-house counsel is often the unsung hero of a legal saga, having guided their…
In a recent decision, General Motors of Canada Limited v. Johnson, the Ontario Court of Appeal provided clarity on an employee’s…
As readers of our Blog and recent update are aware, the blockbuster Supreme Court decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola,…
The law governing family status discrimination under human rights legislation is unsettled and varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. A new…
Date: November 27, 2023 As employers weather the storm of post-pandemic economic sluggishness, rising interest rates and an emboldened workforce,…
Employers are still wrestling with the consequences of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision on the random drug and alcohol testing…
Most employers are likely familiar with the WSIB return to work process which often involves a WSIB employee attending at…
The law on addiction has evolved over the years in arbitral jurisprudence. Earlier decisions treated illness as a mitigating factor…
In Sterling v Wendy’s Restaurant, the applicants (a former Wendy’s employee and his wife), named 14 personal respondents, who were members…
Controlling Costs in Defending Human Rights Complaints – Joe Morrison
Marijuana will soon be legal for recreational use nationwide and many employers are scrambling to respond to the challenges this…
Ryan Conlin discusses recent changes to the WSIB return to work

