It is a good practice for employers to have employees sign a full and final release when their employment is terminated in order to avoid future law suits arising from the employment relationship. Recent cases of the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario illustrate a trend in the jurisprudence toward dismissing human rights applications by employees who have signed a release. Read about these decisions and tips to make your release enforceable in our latest update
Parador Support / About Author
Related Posts
2013 Q4 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 3: WSIB & Forum Shopping (Demo)
Allison Taylor discusses recent decisions from the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario suggesting a disturbing trend in that tribunal permitting…
21 Jan 2014
What is a Reprisal under the Human Rights Code?
By: Ryan Conlin & Frank Portman A recent case from Ontario’s Human Rights Tribunal is a stark reminder of how…
08 Apr 2014
Long and Winding Road Managing Emerging Employment and OHS Issues in the COVID Transition
Employers have made their plans; they’ve hunkered down; and they’ve sheltered in place. As we traverse the long and winding…
11 Dec 2020
WSIB Return to Work Decisions: Are they Binding on the Human Rights Tribunal? – Ryan Conlin
WSIB Return to Work Decisions: Are they Binding on the Human Rights Tribunal? – Ryan Conlin
14 Sep 2010
Significant OHSA Amendments Slated for 2022 (Demo)
Date: Mar 28. 2022 The Ontario Government has proposed significant legislative changes that may impact how accident investigations and enforcement…
28 Mar 2022
Tribunal Awards Four Years’ Lost Wages to Job Applicant Who Lied About Immigration Status (Demo)
The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the “Tribunal”) recently awarded $101,363.16, representing four years’ lost salary, and $15,000.00 for injury to dignity,…
24 Sep 2019
2016 Q2 HR-Law Webinar Part 3: ONCA Upholds Landmark Retroactive Loss Award
Jeremy Schwartz discusses a recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision that upheld a landmark retroactive loss of earnings award from…
19 Jul 2016
Hypothetical Standards: Human Rights Tribunal finds Police Liable for Racism – Jeremy Schwartz (Demo)
Hypothetical Standards: Human Rights Tribunal finds Police Liable for Racism – Jeremy Schwartz
23 Dec 2009
Vaccine Mandates: The Courts and Arbitrators are Weighing In
Date: Dec 06, 2021 Vaccine mandates have been legally and politically controversial in Canada and around the world. We are…
06 Dec 2021
2014 Q3 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 3: Watershed Human Rights Decision (Demo)
Frank Portman discusses a recent, significant decision from the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario concerning remedies and mental illness in…
14 Oct 2014
The Latest on Forum Shopping: The Human Rights Tribunal is Considering Whether a WSIB Case Manager Decision is a “Proceeding†(Demo)
As readers of our Blog and recent update are aware, the blockbuster Supreme Court decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola,…
21 Feb 2012
Medical Evidence and Employee Absences (Demo)
Employers are often unsure whether they have the right to ask for doctor’s notes (i.e. medical evidence) to justify employee…
23 Dec 2016
Human Rights Tribunal Finds that WSIB Discriminated Against an Injured Worker for Refusing to Provide Direct Deposit of Benefit Payments (Demo)
An injured worker has succeeded in a human rights application against the Workplace Safety Insurance Board (“WSIB”). The case related to a…
26 Nov 2012
Divisional Court Clarifies Test for a Poisonous Work Environment (Demo)
When employees allege harassment in human rights complaints, they often refer to the creation of a “poisoned work environment.” A…
16 Jan 2015
What does “Disability” Actually Mean for Accommodation Purposes?
The law is clear that an employer is required to accommodate employees with a “disability” up to the point of…
22 May 2013