It is a good practice for employers to have employees sign a full and final release when their employment is terminated in order to avoid future law suits arising from the employment relationship. Recent cases of the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario illustrate a trend in the jurisprudence toward dismissing human rights applications by employees who have signed a release. Read about these decisions and tips to make your release enforceable in our latest update
Parador Support / About Author
Related Posts
Releases Protect Employers From Human Rights Complaints
It is a good practice for employers to have employees sign a full and final release when their employment is…
2015 Q2 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 2: Record Setting Human Rights Damages
Jessica Young discusses a recent record setting human rights damages award.
22 Jul 2015
Human Rights Tribunal Discourages Unnecessary Naming of Personal Respondents in Applications
In Sterling v Wendy’s Restaurant, the applicants (a former Wendy’s employee and his wife), named 14 personal respondents, who were members…
07 Sep 2011
Random Drug Testing Debate – National Perspective? (Demo)
In April, we blogged that the Supreme Court of Canada had granted leave to appeal a decision regarding the random alcohol testing…
16 Oct 2012
Make Sure Pre-Employment Screening is Complete Before they Start (Demo)
A recent decision of the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the “Tribunal”), Hussey v. Big Brothers Big Sisters of Peterborough Incorporated (“BBBS”), is…
29 Jan 2013
Will this Ever End? Managing Return to Work in the Fourth Wave (Demo)
Even as the world grapples with variants and what appears to be the fourth wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, employers…
24 Aug 2021
The Latest on Forum Shopping: The Human Rights Tribunal is Considering Whether a WSIB Case Manager Decision is a “Proceeding†(Demo)
As readers of our Blog and recent update are aware, the blockbuster Supreme Court decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola,…
21 Feb 2012
Back to Basics: HRTO Follows Figliola and Refuses to Allow Relitigation of WSIB Claim (Demo)
In 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v Figliola (“Figliola”). The Figliola decision addressed the…
05 Dec 2014
COVID-19: Lessons from the HR Trenches (Demo)
Perhaps now more than ever before, the lawyers at Stringer LLP have been deeply engaged, supporting clients who face significant,…
30 Jul 2020
2020 – An HR Law Year in Review (Demo)
In 2020, employers were faced with unprecedented legal challenges brought on by the pandemic. Meanwhile, the courts and tribunals issued…
15 Jan 2021
Human Rights Tribunal Finds that WSIB Discriminated Against an Injured Worker for Refusing to Provide Direct Deposit of Benefit Payments (Demo)
An injured worker has succeeded in a human rights application against the Workplace Safety Insurance Board (“WSIB”). The case related to a…
26 Nov 2012
Divisional Court Clarifies Test for a Poisonous Work Environment
When employees allege harassment in human rights complaints, they often refer to the creation of a “poisoned work environment.” A…
16 Jan 2015
2015 Q1 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 4: Family Status Caselaw Update (Demo)
Allison Taylor explains the unfavourable result of a recent judicial review decision in Alberta concerning family status discrimination.
21 Apr 2015
Avoid Procedural Missteps when Accommodating Mental Disabilities in the Workplace
The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario has heard many cases brought by injured workers against the Workplace Safety and Insurance…
25 Aug 2017
2015 Q1 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 2: Retirement and Terminations
Jessica Young explains the inherent risks associated with “encouraging” employees to retire.
21 Apr 2015