Ryan Conlin and Frank Portman discuss the disturbing trend of increasingly large general damages awards in human rights litigation.
Related Posts
Continuing to Work Following Changes to Employment Not Considered Acceptance of Changes – Joe Morrison
By Jeremy Schwartz and Haadi Malik In April, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice ruled in Coutinho v Ocular Health Centre…
Releases Protect Employers from Human Rights Complaints – Landon Young and Jessica Young
Continuing to Work Following Changes to Employment Not Considered Acceptance of Changes – Joe Morrison
Contracts of all kinds often fall apart over relatively minor details, despite the parties’ agreement on the majority of issues. …
Don’t miss our May 16 Webinar:
After 19 years of protracted litigation, the Human Rights Tribunal of Alberta has now awarded a former employee of Mobil…
Employers are often faced with the galling choice between asserting just cause for termination, and paying potentially large sums of…
Bill 30, An Act to Amend the Employment Standards Act, 2000 in respect of family caregiver leave, went through its second…
Notwithstanding the best wishes of employers, there are times when employees have to be let go for purely financial reasons. …
Premier Kathleen Wynne announced this morning that the Ontario government would introduce new legislation aimed at increasing pay transparency as…
The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario has heard many cases brought by injured workers against the Workplace Safety and Insurance…
Don’t Forget to Consider “Consideration” – Jeremy Schwartz
A recent decision, the Court of Appeal, Mady Development Corp. v. Rossetto, clarified an employee’s entitlement to bonuses who has breached…
The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the “Tribunal”) recently awarded $101,363.16, representing four years’ lost salary, and $15,000.00 for injury to dignity,…

