|Published on November 19, 2012||Stringer LLP Admin|
In a recent decision, the Ontario Court of Justice sentenced the director of six Ontario companies, Steven Blondin, to 90 days in jail for failing to pay wages to employees.
Mr. Blodin is the owner and operator of six companies, Steven’s Inc., Axcea International Inc., Automotive Containment Solutions Inc., Automotive CSI Inc., Automotive CSI-Alliston Inc., and Automotive CSI – Newmarket Inc., all of which were found by an Employment Standards officer (the “ESO”) to owe wages to employees. In total, there were 61 employee complaints across the six companies for unpaid wages between March 2007 and October 2009. The ESO issued 116 orders in total, amounting to over $125,000 in unpaid wages. The companies failed to comply with the orders.
Mr. Blodin and the six companies entered guilty pleas. Mr. Blodin was sentenced to 90 days in jail and fines of $280,000, in addition to the wages owing.
The news release contained the following quotation from the decision:
This sentence serves as a warning to those who believe they are above the law. Our government is committed to ensuring that all Ontarians are treated fairly at work, and we will continue to help ensure that Ontarians know their rights and responsibilities.
Under the Employment Standards Act, a director of a corporation is guilty of an offence if they fail to comply with an order of an ESO to pay wages (s. 136). Under this provision, the director’s liability, however, is limited to a fine of not more than $50,000 and does not include jail time. However, under s.137, if a director permits or acquiesces in an offence, they can be liable for a fine or imprisonment.
This certainly is not a typical result. As indicated in the above quotation, it seems that Mr. Blodin has been used to set an example for other employers who fail to comply with orders from an ESO. It goes without saying that employers should treat orders from an ESO seriously, if the employer decides not to pursue an appeal, they should not delay in complying with the order.
- What does “Disability” Actually Mean for Accommodation Purposes?
- Court of Appeal Case Shows Risks of Gaps in WSIB Coverage of Executives
- Specific Termination Provision Upheld After Sale of Business
- Discipline Warranted for Work Refusal Complaint Not Made in Good Faith
- Dealing effectively with OHS inspectors
- AODA compliance: Benefits of Being Ahead of the Game
- Responding to human rights harassment complaints: Guidelines from the HRTO
- How NOT to Draft an Enforceable Non-Competition Agreement
- So Your AODA Customer Service Standard Report is Past Due?
- Announcing our Complimentary Quarterly Roundup Webinar
- New Developments in Immigration Law for Skilled Trades
- New Employment Contract Term Triggers Constructive Dismissal
- Registration Now Open - Managing the Employment Lifecycle Webinar Series
- Where WSIB Benefits Denied Civil Claim May Proceed
- Alberta Human Rights Tribunal Awards Five Years of Back Pay and Reinstatement
- Stringer LLP Obtains $100K Retroactive NEER Adjustment in WSIAT Appeal
- Ontario Court of Appeal Overturns Blue Mountain Accident Reporting Decision
- Make Sure Pre-Employment Screening is Complete Before they Start
- Split Hairs and Sector Disputes
- Early Bird Registration is now open for First Reference's Ontario Employment Law Conference
- Early Morning OLRB Ruling Finds Teachers' Planned Day of Protest an Illegal Strike
- Court of Appeal Protects Manager from Personal Liability on Employee Termination
- class actions
- constitutional law
- construction labour relations
- constructive dismissal
- disability benefits
- employment insurance
- employment law
- employment standards
- fiduciary duties
- first nations
- general litigation
- human rights
- labour law
- labour relations
- occupational health and safety
- restrictive covenants
- stringer llp announcements
- workers' compensation
- wrongful dismissal litigation