HR Blog

HR Blog
Changes to Privacy Legislation: Impact on Employers’ Handling of Employee Information
|
Published on November 15, 2011 | |
Stringer LLP Admin |
The federal government has re-introduced legislation to amend the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA). Bill C-12, Safeguarding Canadians’ Personal Information Act, which was introduced on September 29, 2011, had been previously introduced in Parliament in 2010, but failed to be passed into law because of the intervening federal election.
The legislation includes some significant changes:
- - An exemption in having to obtain consent from employees’ to the release of their personal information in the context of business transactions,
- - A new requirement to notify the Privacy Commissioner and affected individuals of any material breaches in security of personal information, and
- - An exclusion of “business contact information” from the obligations in PIPEDA in certain circumstances.
Exemption in Business Transactions
The bill provides an exemption for use and disclosure of employees’ personal information when it is disclosed in the context of a business transaction. In order for this exemption to apply, several criteria must be met. First, the information must be necessary for the parties to determine whether or not to proceed with and/or complete the transaction. Second, the business parties must have entered into a confidentiality agreement that requires that the information be used solely for the purposes related to the transaction, that the information be destroyed if the transaction is not concluded, and appropriate security measures are taken to protect the personal information.
Breach Notification
The bill also provides that the Privacy Commissioner must be notified of any material breaches in security, and further requires that individuals be notified, including employees, if it is reasonable to believe that such breach creates a “real risk of significant harm to the individual”. The bill provides some factors to be considered in determining whether or not a breach is serious enough to be considered a “material” breach. These include the number of individuals affected, the sensitivity of the information, and whether the breach is indicative of a systematic problem.
Business Contact Information
The bill clarifies that business contact information is to be excluded from the obligations of PIPEDA if it is collected, used or disclosed solely for the purpose of communications relating to the individuals employment, business, or profession.
The bill has not yet passed first reading but is expected to become law sometime in the New Year.
Subscribe to Blog feed
Recent Blog
- Court Signals Summary Judgement Often Appropriate for Wrongful Dismissal Actions
- Minister Jason Kenney Announces changes to the Immigration System to Promote Canadian Labour Market
- Landmark Decision on Certification of ESA Class Actions and Constructive Dismissal
- OLRB rules on electrician exemption in construction regulation
- What Does the Crown Have to Prove in an OHSA Prosecution?
- The Supreme Court to Lay Down the Law on Random Alcohol Testing
- OLRB Directs Inspector to Produce Investigation Records
- Employer Successfully Defends a Charge of Failing to Report an Accident to WSIB
- Minor Change to the OLRB’s Rules of Procedure could have a Major Impact
- Debate Continues over Family Caregiver Leave
- Divisional Court provides Guidance as to What Constitutes a Prima Facie Case of Discrimination
- Forum Shopping a Growing Problem - Published in The Lawyers Weekly
- Bill 168 and Section 50 of the OHSA: Has the Labour Board Closed the Floodgates?
- Proposed Family Caregiver Leave goes through Second Reading
- British Columbia Court of Appeal upholds just cause dismissal
- The Latest on Forum Shopping: The Human Rights Tribunal is Considering Whether a WSIB Case Manager Decision is a “Proceeding”
- Employees in fiduciary relationships may be entitled to bonuses even upon breach of duties
- ONCA Upholds Brito but Quashes Punitive Award
- Invasion of Privacy in the Workplace Could Lead to Liability for Snooping Employees
- Human Rights Tribunal Heeding Clear Direction from Supreme Court
- Taking a Hard Line on Termination Entitlements Ends Up Costing More
Categories
- aoda
- class actions
- construction labour relations
- constructive dismissal
- disability benefits
- employment insurance
- employment law
- employment standards
- fiduciary duties
- first nations
- general litigation
- human rights
- immigration
- labour law
- occupational health and safety
- privacy
- restrictive covenants
- stringer llp announcements
- workers' compensation
- wrongful dismissal litigation


