Jeff Murray discusses a recent landmark contract decision from the Supreme Court of Canada
Related Posts
The Ontario Superior Court has ruled that an employee who continued to work for 15 months following a change in…
This is segment 5 of 5 from our Q3 webinar held on Thursday, October 10, “Risks Associated with Reducing Post-Retirement Benefits”
By: Allison Taylor Employers should be dismayed by the result in the recent case before the Ontario Court of Appeal…
In February, we wrote about a decision by the Federal Court of Appeal in Wilson v Atomic Energy Limited (see our earlier…
By: Jeremy D. Schwartz and Frank B. Portman The recent Supreme Court decision in Sattva Capital Corp v Creston Moly Corp …
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice has refused to permit a group of former Allstate Insurance employees to sue Allstate…
Don’t Forget to Consider “Consideration” – Jeremy Schwartz
Employers, ever-weary of the next judicial pronouncement on the enforceability of specific termination clauses in employment contracts, may mark a…
The law in Canada regarding random drug and alcohol testing has been inconsistent for some time, with the Alberta and…
Compliance with the new Employment Standard under AODA – Jessica Young
For years the term “Right to Work” state has been synonymous with jurisdictions in the American South, where unions have…
In a past Stringer Update, Releases Protect Employers from Human Rights Complaints, we emphasized the importance of having terminated employees sign…
In a decision by a rare, five-judge panel, the Ontario Court of Appeal (ONCA) ruled that a specific notice provision…
In Lancia v. Park Dentistry, the Ontario Superior Court confirmed that employers can change the fundamental terms of an employee’s employment,…
The law has become increasingly sensitive to the need for the protection of personal information from public disclosure. This is…

