Frank Portman discusses a recent, significant decision from the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario concerning remedies and mental illness in the workplace.
Related Posts
Employers have a duty to accommodate employees with disabilities to the point of undue hardship, including facilitating the return to…
A recent decision of the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the “Tribunal”), Hussey v. Big Brothers Big Sisters of Peterborough Incorporated (“BBBS”), is…
In a recent application to the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario, the Tribunal found that an employer facing an economic…
Hypothetical Standards: Human Rights Tribunal finds Police Liable for Racism – Jeremy Schwartz
Workplace investigations have been an increasingly important topic for HR Professionals in the past few years. Employers have a duty…
When employees allege harassment in human rights complaints, they often refer to the creation of a “poisoned work environment.” A…
Jessica Young explains the inherent risks associated with “encouraging” employees to retire.
Significant Changes to the Human Rights Tribunal’s Rules – Kelly McDermott and Jeremy Schwartz
Jeremy Schwartz and Jessica Young recently published an article on forum shopping by disabled employees in the Lawyers Weekly: Labour & Employment…
Register Now! As always, our goal is to provide a concise, high-level summary of the most significant legal developments affecting…
It is a good practice for employers to have employees sign a full and final release when their employment is…
As readers of our Blog and recent update are aware, the blockbuster Supreme Court decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola,…
Controlling Costs in Defending Human Rights Complaints – Joe Morrison
Employers must accommodate employees with disabilities to the point of undue hardship under the Ontario Human Rights Code. The accommodation of…
Ryan Conlin and Jeremy Schwartz discuss a landmark WSIAT decision which held sections of the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act…