Frank Portman discusses a recent, significant decision from the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario concerning remedies and mental illness in the workplace.
Related Posts
By: Jeremy Schwartz The Ontario Court of Appeal (ONCA) has quashed an arbitration award which upheld a just cause termination. …
Since the Supreme Court decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola (“Figliola”), the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the…
Date: Mar 28. 2022 The Ontario Government has proposed significant legislative changes that may impact how accident investigations and enforcement…
Jessica Young explains the inherent risks associated with “encouraging” employees to retire.
When is an owner also an “employee”? The Supreme Court of Canada recently rendered a decision on the question of…
Hypothetical Standards: Human Rights Tribunal finds Police Liable for Racism – Jeremy Schwartz
In a recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada, the Court dealt with the issue of awarding legal costs…
Allison Taylor explains the unfavourable result of a recent judicial review decision in Alberta concerning family status discrimination.
By: Ryan Conlin & Frank Portman A recent case from Ontario’s Human Rights Tribunal is a stark reminder of how…
As we have noted in previous updates, the size of general damages awarded by human rights tribunals has trended sharply…
In April, we blogged that the Supreme Court of Canada had granted leave to appeal a decision regarding the random alcohol testing…
Technological advancements frequently outpace the law’s ability to respond to the challenges they create. With the click of a button,…
Significant Changes to the Human Rights Tribunal’s Rules – Kelly McDermott and Jeremy Schwartz
Ryan Conlin and Frank Portman discuss the disturbing trend of increasingly large general damages awards in human rights litigation.
By: Jeremy Schwartz The Ontario Court of Appeal (ONCA) has quashed an arbitration award which upheld a just cause termination. …

