The Boyce decision establishes that at least in some instances injured workers are free to attempt to concurrently pursue Human Rights Code remedies against their employer even if the WSIB has ruled in the employer’s favour with respect to whether work is suitable
Jeremy D. Schwartz / About Author
Related Posts
2015 Q1 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 2: Retirement and Terminations
Jessica Young explains the inherent risks associated with “encouraging” employees to retire.
21 Apr 2015
Is the Sky Falling? Family Status Discrimination and Shift Shopping
By: Ryan Conlin & Frank Portman In most jurisdictions in Canada, human rights legislation prohibits discrimination on the basis of…
07 Mar 2014
Back to Basics: HRTO Follows Figliola and Refuses to Allow Relitigation of WSIB Claim
In 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v Figliola (“Figliola”). The Figliola decision addressed the…
05 Dec 2014
Think You Suffered Family Status Discrimination? First Things First – Were You Employed in Ontario or B.C.?
The law governing family status discrimination under human rights legislation is unsettled and varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. A new…
16 Apr 2019
Holiday Webinar 4: Employee Discipline
Allison Taylor discusses progressive discipline and termination for employee misconduct.
21 Dec 2016
Rising Tide of Human Rights Damages
Ryan Conlin and Frank Portman discuss the disturbing trend of increasingly large general damages awards in human rights litigation.
25 Jun 2014
Responding to human rights harassment complaints: Guidelines from the HRTO
You are an employer that has just received a harassment complaint from an employee. The complaint is against a valued…
28 Mar 2013
2014 Q2 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 4: FCA Establishes New Family Status Test
Allison Taylor discusses the recent Federal Court of Appeal decision which outlined a new, balanced test for family status discrimination…
23 Jul 2014
It Takes Two to Tango: Superior Court Rules on Employees’ Duty to Facilitate in the Accommodation Process
Employers have a duty to accommodate employees with disabilities to the point of undue hardship, including facilitating the return to…
16 May 2016
Federal Court of Appeal Revises Test for Family Status Discrimination
In another twist in the rapidly developing area of family status discrimination law, the Federal Court of Appeal recently released…
20 May 2014
Stress Claim Tsunami: New Approach to WSIB Stress Claims
Ryan Conlin and Jeremy Schwartz discuss a landmark WSIAT decision which held sections of the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act…
29 May 2014
Allison Taylor Speaks to Canadian @HRReporter About Managing Disabled Employees
Tweet This Post Posted on Wednesday, July 6th, 2011 at 11:24 am Categories: Uncategorized.
16 Jul 2011
Addiction without compulsion: no defence to serious misconduct using the “hybrid” approach
The law on addiction has evolved over the years in arbitral jurisprudence. Earlier decisions treated illness as a mitigating factor…
03 Mar 2017
Random Drug Testing Debate – National Perspective?
In April, we blogged that the Supreme Court of Canada had granted leave to appeal a decision regarding the random alcohol testing…
16 Oct 2012
Preferential Treatment for Employees with Active WSIB Claims not Discriminatory
The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the “Tribunal”) recently held that it is not discriminatory for employers to treat disabled…
25 Oct 2017