The Boyce decision establishes that at least in some instances injured workers are free to attempt to concurrently pursue Human Rights Code remedies against their employer even if the WSIB has ruled in the employer’s favour with respect to whether work is suitable
Related Posts
Since the early 1980s, plaintiffs have been precluded from bringing court actions solely predicated on suffering discrimination or harassment under…
The law governing family status discrimination under human rights legislation is unsettled and varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. A new…
Perhaps now more than ever before, the lawyers at Stringer LLP have been deeply engaged, supporting clients who face significant,…
Ryan Conlin discusses recent changes to the WSIB return to work
Date: Dec 06, 2021 Vaccine mandates have been legally and politically controversial in Canada and around the world. We are…
Canadian employers have been confronted with a veritable ocean of new government programs, which are designed to help weather the…
The World Health Organization has declared COVID-19 a global pandemic. Not since H1N1 and SARS before that, have employers faced…
Jessica Young discusses a recent record setting human rights damages award.
An office holiday party is a great time to unwind as a team and encourage a sense of community. Unfortunately,…
By: Ryan Conlin and Frank Portman Human Rights Tribunals across the country have been issuing damage awards which have raised…
The law on addiction has evolved over the years in arbitral jurisprudence. Earlier decisions treated illness as a mitigating factor…
Jessica Young discusses a recent record setting human rights damages award.
Date: Mar 04. 2022 The Omicron wave appears to be receding and there is cautious optimism that the worst of…
WSIB Return to Work Decisions: Are they Binding on the Human Rights Tribunal? – Ryan Conlin
Perhaps now more than ever before, the lawyers at Stringer LLP have been deeply engaged, supporting clients who face significant,…

