Ryan Conlin and Frank Portman discuss the disturbing trend of increasingly large general damages awards in human rights litigation.
Related Posts
In the second quarter of 2014, the Ministry of Labour conducted an enforcement “blitz,” targeting companies in several sectors with intern…
Ryan Conlin of Stringer LLP discusses recent jurisprudence concerning random drug and alcohol testing in Canada (post-Irving).
Would it be a constructive dismissal to refuse to pay an employee the third of a million dollars you owe…
Don’t Forget to Consider “Consideration” – Jeremy Schwartz
Supreme Court Allows Employees to “Double-Up” on Pregnancy and Parental Benefits A regular point of contention between unions and employers…
Employers, ever-weary of the next judicial pronouncement on the enforceability of specific termination clauses in employment contracts, may mark a…
In a decision by a rare, five-judge panel, the Ontario Court of Appeal (ONCA) ruled that a specific notice provision…
Most employers are likely familiar with the WSIB return to work process which often involves a WSIB employee attending at…
Frank Portman discusses a recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision which greatly increased the scope of general and other damages…
The Alberta Court of Appeal recently upheld a trial decision that struck a termination clause down as unenforceable. The Facts…
In Klonteig v West Kelowna (District), the British Columbia Superior Court found that an employer that terminated a firefighter for driving…
Allison discusses the difference between a valid and invalid resignation
Jeremy Schwartz and Jessica Young recently published an article on forum shopping by disabled employees in the Lawyers Weekly: Labour & Employment…
Contracts of all kinds often fall apart over relatively minor details, despite the parties’ agreement on the majority of issues. …