Employers who only provide the minimum amounts required by employment standards legislation after termination are gambling. Sometimes this approach can result in cost savings, but it can also end in a costly damages and legal costs award as occurred in the case of Brito v. Canac Kitchens. Read our Latest Update for more information about the case, and what to do to protect your organization from such awards.
Jeremy D. Schwartz / About Author
Related Posts
Court Strikes Down Release Signed on Termination
Ontario’s Superior Court of Justice recently struck down a release signed at a termination meeting. Read more about this interesting…
18 Jun 2012
Office Holiday Parties – The Fine Print
An office holiday party is a great time to unwind as a team and encourage a sense of community. Unfortunately,…
14 Dec 2012
Court of Appeal Protects Manager from Personal Liability on Employee Termination
A well-drafted contract protects not only the company but also its employees and senior personnel. In a recent decision, Richards v….
09 Jan 2013
If it Looks Like Theft and Quacks Like Theft…the Employer may Still pay
While employee theft is frequently grounds for termination, shades of grey do appear in the case law. In a recent…
09 Sep 2014
Court finds Abandonment for Failure to Return to Work or Provide Medical
Disability management is a challenging issue for HR professionals. An employee with a disability may require an extended absence from…
09 Sep 2015
Compliance with the new Employment Standard under AODA – Jessica Young (Demo)
Compliance with the new Employment Standard under AODA – Jessica Young
22 Jul 2011
New Year’s Hangover: The Curious Case of the 27 Paycheque Year (Demo)
The calendar has now changed over to 2015, and with the New Year comes an interesting legal situation for certain…
07 Jan 2015
Probationary clauses: A double-edged sword for employers
Many employers find it necessary to assess new employees’ performance on the job before making a final determination about whether…
17 Feb 2017
Court of Appeal Rules on Employers’ Obligations to Protect Employees from Harassment and Violence when they are Away from the Workplace
In a recent decision, the Ontario Court of Appeal upheld a lower court’s ruling that a citizen’s harassing behaviour toward…
19 Sep 2017
Embracing the #MeToo Movement (Demo)
#MeToo has quickly caught wind as a widespread movement that sheds light on the prevalence of sexual assault and harassment,…
18 Sep 2019
Minimizing Mitigation: Court of Appeal gives employee benefit of the doubt (Demo)
A recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision dealt a blow to employers’ ability to credit employee mitigation efforts and income…
07 Jul 2017
Shifting Sands: Ontario Court of Appeal Upholds Termination Clause
Employers, ever-weary of the next judicial pronouncement on the enforceability of specific termination clauses in employment contracts, may mark a…
28 Feb 2018
Pay in Lieu of Notice by Salary Continuance Deemed Implicit Right
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently ruled in Bowes v. Goss Power Products Ltd., that a fairly standard termination provision…
29 Sep 2011
The New Normal The Legal Landscape for Wrongful Dismissal Cases in a Post COVID World (Demo)
COVID-19 has caused unprecedented disruption in the economies all over the world. Employers who have had to lay off or…
26 Feb 2021
No evidence? No aggravated damages – Employees must prove basis for damages based on manner of dismissal
The Ontario Superior Court recently confirmed that for a court to award damages based on the manner in which an…
08 Feb 2017