Employers who only provide the minimum amounts required by employment standards legislation after termination are gambling. Sometimes this approach can result in cost savings, but it can also end in a costly damages and legal costs award as occurred in the case of Brito v. Canac Kitchens. Read our Latest Update for more information about the case, and what to do to protect your organization from such awards.
Jeremy D. Schwartz / About Author
Related Posts
2020Q1 Complimentary Quarterly HR-Law Webinar
During this edition of Stringer LLP’s complimentary Quarterly HR-Law Webinar series, broadcast on Monday, January 20, 2020, Ryan Conlin, Jeremy Schwartz and Erika Montisano discussed…
20 Jan 2020
Consideration: What’s Good for the Goose is Good for the Gander (Demo)
In a unique set of circumstances, the Ontario Superior Court recently found that changes to an employment contract which benefited…
31 Jan 2018
Significant OHSA Amendments Slated for 2022
Date: Mar 28. 2022 The Ontario Government has proposed significant legislative changes that may impact how accident investigations and enforcement…
28 Mar 2022
Minimizing Mitigation: Court of Appeal gives employee benefit of the doubt
A recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision dealt a blow to employers’ ability to credit employee mitigation efforts and income…
07 Jul 2017
Alberta court rules on the limits of good faith in the performance of employment contracts
In a recent decision, the Alberta Court of Appeal strongly affirmed employers’ right to terminate employees without cause, and without…
31 Jan 2017
Proposed Family Caregiver Leave goes through Second Reading (Demo)
Bill 30, An Act to Amend the Employment Standards Act, 2000 in respect of family caregiver leave, went through its second…
27 Feb 2012
Navigating the Attendance Management Minefield in the COVID era (Demo)
On September 4, 2020, Ryan and Jeremy discussed the legal tightrope in terms of employee attendance management, that employers must…
04 Sep 2020
Minister Jason Kenney Announces changes to the Immigration System to Promote Canadian Labour Market (Demo)
The Ministry of Citizenship and Immigration Canada has made several announcements over the past couple weeks regarding proposed changes to…
30 Apr 2012
Blame the Lawyer? Drawing Best Practices for In-House Counsel from the Jurisprudence (Demo)
By: Jeremy Schwartz and Amanda Boyce In-house counsel is often the unsung hero of a legal saga, having guided their…
14 Sep 2016
Going Global: Ontario Superior Court Grants Severance Pay Based on Non-Ontario Payroll (Demo)
By: Jeremy Schwartz and Frank Portman A recent French language decision from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice indicates that…
08 Aug 2014
Make Sure Pre-Employment Screening is Complete Before they Start
A recent decision of the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the “Tribunal”), Hussey v. Big Brothers Big Sisters of Peterborough Incorporated (“BBBS”), is…
29 Jan 2013
WSIB loss of Earnings Benefits still offset against Wrongful Dismissal Damages in Ontario
In a recent decision, Jensen v. Schaeffler Canada Inc., the Ontario Superior Court of Justice reduced an employee’s pay in lieu of…
25 Jul 2011
Court of Appeal Rules on Employers’ Obligations to Protect Employees from Harassment and Violence when they are Away from the Workplace
In a recent decision, the Ontario Court of Appeal upheld a lower court’s ruling that a citizen’s harassing behaviour toward…
19 Sep 2017
Take It or Leave It: How NOT to Change Terms in an Employment Contract – Greg McGinnis and Jeremy Schwartz (Demo)
Take It or Leave It: How NOT to Change Terms in an Employment Contract – Greg McGinnis and Jeremy Schwartz
23 Jun 2008
Federal Court of Appeal Rules on When Federal Employers Must Appoint a Workplace Violence Investigator
The Canadian law on workplace violence and harassment continues to develop, particularly in relation to the duty to investigate. Employers…
22 Mar 2016