Employers who only provide the minimum amounts required by employment standards legislation after termination are gambling. Sometimes this approach can result in cost savings, but it can also end in a costly damages and legal costs award as occurred in the case of Brito v. Canac Kitchens. Read our Latest Update for more information about the case, and what to do to protect your organization from such awards.
Jeremy D. Schwartz / About Author
Related Posts
It’s Party Time: Planning a Safe and Liability Free Office Holiday Party
As we roll into December, many employers will be hosting an office holiday party for their employees. While these events…
29 Nov 2011
Navigating the Attendance Management Minefield in the COVID era
On September 4, 2020, Ryan and Jeremy discussed the legal tightrope in terms of employee attendance management, that employers must…
04 Sep 2020
The Truth Will Set You Free – A Bad Reference is Not Necessarily Defamatory
The Divisional Court recently upheld a trial decision finding that an employer did not defame a former employee when it…
12 Nov 2018
When a resignation isn’t really a resignation
How do you know when an employee has quit her job? It may seem like a simple question, but the…
24 Jan 2017
Personal Liability in Wrongful Dismissal Actions
A recent decision of the Divisional Court raises the issue of when an individual can be found personally liable in…
31 Jan 2014
Working Notice Inappropriate for Employees Who Cannot Work
The Ontario Superior Court recently awarded an employee on leave due to disability, damages representing the salary he would have…
19 Dec 2017
“Rocket Docket” to Summary Judgment in “Without Cause” Wrongful Dismissal Cases
An Ontario Court has signaled that it is prepared to adjudicate wrongful dismissal cases very quickly where the employer has not asserted…
26 Jul 2013
Dial “D” for Dismissal: Employee Fired after “Pocket-Dial”
Most people have received (or sent) a “pocket-dial”, which is an unintentional cell phone call that is made by a…
15 Oct 2015
Announcing our Complimentary Quarterly HR-Law Webinar (Q2)
Our first quarterly, HR-Law Webinar was a great success, with over 150 registrants. Thank you to those who joined us…
17 Jun 2013
2013 Q3 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 2: Summary Judgement
This is segment 2 of 5 from our Q3 webinar held on Thursday, October 10, “Recent Developments in Summary Judgement Motions”
12 Oct 2013
Pay in Lieu of Notice by Salary Continuance Deemed Implicit Right
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently ruled in Bowes v. Goss Power Products Ltd., that a fairly standard termination provision…
29 Sep 2011
How NOT to Draft an Enforceable Non-Competition Agreement – Jeremy Schwartz
By: Jeremy Schwartz Some organizations subscribe to the close your eyes and think good thoughts school of drafting, when it comes to…
20 Mar 2013
Jumping to Conclusions Proves Costly for Employer
A recent decision from the Ontario Superior Court is a reminder to employers that dismissal for just cause must be…
08 Jan 2016
Court Rules no Class Action for Constructive Dismissal
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice has refused to permit a group of former Allstate Insurance employees to sue Allstate…
29 Apr 2011
Honesty is the best policy – Court of Appeal upholds dishonest employee’s dismissal for just cause
Employers are often faced with the galling choice between asserting just cause for termination, and paying potentially large sums of…
19 Jun 2017