The Ontario Superior Court has ruled that an employee who continued to work for 15 months following a change in his terms and conditions of employment had not condoned the change and could claim damages for constructive dismissal. Read more about this surprising decision and key lessons for employers to learn in our Latest Update.
Jeremy D. Schwartz / About Author
Related Posts
Minimizing Mitigation: Court of Appeal gives employee benefit of the doubt (Demo)
A recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision dealt a blow to employers’ ability to credit employee mitigation efforts and income…
07 Jul 2017
Navigating the Attendance Management Minefield in the COVID era
On September 4, 2020, Ryan and Jeremy discussed the legal tightrope in terms of employee attendance management, that employers must…
04 Sep 2020
Workplace Policies Key in BC Court of Appeal Decision Upholding Just Cause Dismissal (Demo)
Terminating employees in Canada can be expensive. Non-unionized employees are owed “reasonable notice” under the common law, or pay in…
19 Jun 2015
Specific Termination Provision Upheld After Sale of Business (Demo)
When a company purchases another business, it is important to consider the legal implications respecting the status of employees. The…
08 May 2013
Specific Termination Provision Upheld After Sale of Business
When a company purchases another business, it is important to consider the legal implications respecting the status of employees. The…
Court finds Abandonment for Failure to Return to Work or Provide Medical
Disability management is a challenging issue for HR professionals. An employee with a disability may require an extended absence from…
09 Sep 2015
How NOT to Draft an Enforceable Non-Competition Agreement
To be enforceable, non-competition agreements must, as a general rule, be reasonable and unambiguous in terms of their geographic scope,…
20 Mar 2013
COVID-19: Lessons from the HR Trenches (Demo)
Perhaps now more than ever before, the lawyers at Stringer LLP have been deeply engaged, supporting clients who face significant,…
30 Jul 2020
2015 Q1 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 3: Social Media in the Workplace
Jeremy Schwartz compares the results of two termination grievances arising out of racist and misogynistic tweets.
21 Apr 2015
Court Rules no Class Action for Constructive Dismissal
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice has refused to permit a group of former Allstate Insurance employees to sue Allstate…
29 Apr 2011
Off-Duty Drunk Driving Not Just Cause for Termination – Even for a Firefighter (Demo)
In Klonteig v West Kelowna (District), the British Columbia Superior Court found that an employer that terminated a firefighter for driving…
27 Jun 2018
Employees in fiduciary relationships may be entitled to bonuses even upon breach of duties
A recent decision, the Court of Appeal, Mady Development Corp. v. Rossetto, clarified an employee’s entitlement to bonuses who has breached…
14 Feb 2012
Dial “D” for Dismissal: Employee Fired after “Pocket-Dial”
Most people have received (or sent) a “pocket-dial”, which is an unintentional cell phone call that is made by a…
15 Oct 2015
2013 Q3 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 1: AODA Update
This is segment 1 of 5 from our Q3 webinar held on Thursday, October 10, “Upcoming AODA Obligations – What You Need…
12 Oct 2013