In a recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada, the Court dealt with the issue of awarding legal costs in a human rights complaint. This decision provides a good reminder to employers and employees of the significance of legal costs in such proceedings. Read about this decision and the practical implications in our Latest Update.
Jeremy D. Schwartz / About Author
Related Posts
When is an Owner an Employee?
When is an owner also an “employee”? The Supreme Court of Canada recently rendered a decision on the question of…
24 Jun 2014
Failure to mitigate reduces damages in Human Rights claim
In the wake of the Divisional Court’s decision in the Hamilton-Wentworth District School Board v Fair, human rights damages have been…
07 Nov 2014
Alberta Human Rights Tribunal Awards Employee $650,000 – Kelly McDermott
Alberta Human Rights Tribunal Awards Employee $650,000 – Kelly McDermott
09 Sep 2010
Stress Claim Tsunami: New Approach to WSIB Stress Claims
Ryan Conlin and Jeremy Schwartz discuss a landmark WSIAT decision which held sections of the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act…
29 May 2014
Forum Shopping a Growing Problem – Published in The Lawyers Weekly
Jeremy Schwartz and Jessica Young recently published an article on forum shopping by disabled employees in the Lawyers Weekly: Labour & Employment…
06 Mar 2012
The Latest on Forum Shopping: The Human Rights Tribunal is Considering Whether a WSIB Case Manager Decision is a “Proceedingâ€
As readers of our Blog and recent update are aware, the blockbuster Supreme Court decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola,…
21 Feb 2012
2015 Q1 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 4: Family Status Caselaw Update
Allison Taylor explains the unfavourable result of a recent judicial review decision in Alberta concerning family status discrimination.
21 Apr 2015
BC Labour Relations Board waters down Irving Pulp
Employers are still wrestling with the consequences of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision on the random drug and alcohol testing…
26 May 2014
Human Rights Tribunal Discourages Unnecessary Naming of Personal Respondents in Applications
In Sterling v Wendy’s Restaurant, the applicants (a former Wendy’s employee and his wife), named 14 personal respondents, who were members…
07 Sep 2011
2014 Q2 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 4: FCA Establishes New Family Status Test
Allison Taylor discusses the recent Federal Court of Appeal decision which outlined a new, balanced test for family status discrimination…
23 Jul 2014
OLRB opens the door to harassment reprisal complaints under the OHSA
The Ontario Labour Relations Board (“OLRB”) recently made an important decision which may represent a significant shift in how it…
08 Jan 2014
Double the Previous Record Awarded in Damages for Sexual Harassment
As we have noted in previous updates, the size of general damages awarded by human rights tribunals has trended sharply…
15 Jun 2015
Deal or No Deal?
Contracts of all kinds often fall apart over relatively minor details, despite the parties’ agreement on the majority of issues. …
26 Jun 2014
Obese Resident Awarded Preferred Parking Space – Jeremy D. Schwartz
Obese Resident Awarded Preferred Parking Space – Jeremy D. Schwartz
18 Feb 2010
2016 Q2 HR-Law Webinar Part 4: Random Drug and Alcohol Testing
Jeff Murray discusses a recent Alberta Court of Queens Bench decision that overturned an arbitration panel’s finding that Suncor’s random…
19 Jul 2016