Allison Taylor explains the unfavourable result of a recent judicial review decision in Alberta concerning family status discrimination.
Related Posts
Supreme Court Allows Employees to “Double-Up” on Pregnancy and Parental Benefits A regular point of contention between unions and employers…
When is an owner also an “employee”? The Supreme Court of Canada recently rendered a decision on the question of…
Allison Taylor discusses the recent Federal Court of Appeal decision which outlined a new, balanced test for family status discrimination…
An office holiday party is a great time to unwind as a team and encourage a sense of community. Unfortunately,…
Supreme Court Allows Employees to “Double-Up” on Pregnancy and Parental Benefits A regular point of contention between unions and employers…
In a decision that will surely draw attention across the country, the Alberta Human Rights Tribunal has awarded an employee 5 years…
In a decision that will surely draw attention across the country, the Alberta Human Rights Tribunal has awarded an employee 5 years…
A recent Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario decision confirms that family status protection may require employers to accommodate employees’ sporadic…
Tweet This Post Posted on Wednesday, July 6th, 2011 at 11:24 am Categories: Uncategorized.
In Thompson v. 1552754 Ontario Inc., the applicant was employed as a counter person at the respondent’s coffee shop. The applicant…
In Sterling v Wendy’s Restaurant, the applicants (a former Wendy’s employee and his wife), named 14 personal respondents, who were members…
The Psychological Health and Safety in the Workplace – Prevention, promotion and guidance to staged implementation (the “Standard”) was released by the…
After 19 years of protracted litigation, the Human Rights Tribunal of Alberta has now awarded a former employee of Mobil…
Hypothetical Standards: Human Rights Tribunal finds Police Liable for Racism – Jeremy Schwartz
Jessica Young discusses a recent record setting human rights damages award.

