The Boyce decision establishes that at least in some instances injured workers are free to attempt to concurrently pursue Human Rights Code remedies against their employer even if the WSIB has ruled in the employer’s favour with respect to whether work is suitable
Jeremy D. Schwartz / About Author
Related Posts
The Human Rights Tribunal Says No to Forum Shopping
It has been a year since the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola (“Figliola”). In…
08 Nov 2012
What is the next step in AODA compliance? (Demo)
The AODA Employment Standard deadlines are not as far away as they may seem. The Employment Standard is one of…
26 May 2014
Accommodating scent sensitivities in the workplace (Demo)
Employers must accommodate employees with disabilities to the point of undue hardship under the Ontario Human Rights Code. The accommodation of…
15 Oct 2012
Is the Sky Falling? Family Status Discrimination and Shift Shopping
By: Ryan Conlin & Frank Portman In most jurisdictions in Canada, human rights legislation prohibits discrimination on the basis of…
07 Mar 2014
The Road Back Safety and Employment Law Considerations for Re Opening the Workplace (Demo)
In this webinar, Ryan Conlin and Landon Young provided guidance for employers on how to respond to the legal challenges…
02 Jun 2020
Alberta Human Rights Tribunal Awards Employee $650,000 – Kelly McDermott
Alberta Human Rights Tribunal Awards Employee $650,000 – Kelly McDermott
09 Sep 2010
Tribunal Awards Four Years’ Lost Wages to Job Applicant Who Lied About Immigration Status
The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the “Tribunal”) recently awarded $101,363.16, representing four years’ lost salary, and $15,000.00 for injury to dignity,…
24 Sep 2019
2014 Q3 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 1: WSIB Return to Work
Ryan Conlin discusses recent changes to the WSIB return to work
14 Oct 2014
Has BC Court opened the door to more court claims of harassment? (Demo)
Since the early 1980s, plaintiffs have been precluded from bringing court actions solely predicated on suffering discrimination or harassment under…
09 Apr 2019
Failure to mitigate reduces damages in Human Rights claim (Demo)
In the wake of the Divisional Court’s decision in the Hamilton-Wentworth District School Board v Fair, human rights damages have been…
07 Nov 2014
Addiction without compulsion: no defence to serious misconduct using the “hybrid” approach
The law on addiction has evolved over the years in arbitral jurisprudence. Earlier decisions treated illness as a mitigating factor…
03 Mar 2017
Human Rights Code Amended to Include Gender Identity (Demo)
The Ontario Human Rights Code (the “Code”) was recently amended to add “gender identity or gender expression” as a ground of discrimination….
31 Jul 2012
Gloves Come Off: Sky High Damages in Human Rights Cases (Demo)
By: Ryan Conlin and Frank Portman Human Rights Tribunals across the country have been issuing damage awards which have raised…
05 Jun 2014
Human Rights Tribunal Heeding Clear Direction from Supreme Court
In British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola, a decision released in October 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada found that…
25 Jan 2012
SCC Weighs in on Costs Awards in Human Rights Complaints (Demo)
In a recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada, the Court dealt with the issue of awarding legal costs…
01 Nov 2011