Employers who only provide the minimum amounts required by employment standards legislation after termination are gambling. Sometimes this approach can result in cost savings, but it can also end in a costly damages and legal costs award as occurred in the case of Brito v. Canac Kitchens. Read our Latest Update for more information about the case, and what to do to protect your organization from such awards.
Jeremy D. Schwartz / About Author
Related Posts
Long and Winding Road Managing Emerging Employment and OHS Issues in the COVID Transition
Employers have made their plans; they’ve hunkered down; and they’ve sheltered in place. As we traverse the long and winding…
11 Dec 2020
When a resignation isn’t really a resignation (Demo)
How do you know when an employee has quit her job? It may seem like a simple question, but the…
24 Jan 2017
Employers Not Liable for Tort of Negligent Investigation – But… – Jeffrey Murray and Jeremy Schwartz
Employers Not Liable for Tort of Negligent Investigation – But… – Jeffrey Murray and Jeremy Schwartz
21 Jul 2008
Jurisdiction Over First Nations’ Employment and Labour Issues: Is it Federal or Provincial?
Jurisdiction over employment in First Nations and aboriginal employers can be a complicated issue. Until recently, different courts seemed to…
13 Sep 2011
Working Notice Inappropriate for Employees Who Cannot Work (Demo)
The Ontario Superior Court recently awarded an employee on leave due to disability, damages representing the salary he would have…
19 Dec 2017
Court of Appeal upholds decision granting employee notice period based on employment with predecessors
We have previously written on the decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Danbury v 1416088 Ontario Ltd (see our…
15 May 2015
2014 Q3 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 4: AODA Enforcement Update (Demo)
Jessica Young discusses recent enforcement activities under the new Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA)
14 Oct 2014
Holiday Webinar 1: Social Host Liability (Demo)
Jeff Murray discusses social host liability for employers.
21 Dec 2016
Announcing our Complimentary Quarterly HR-Law Webinar (Q2)
Our first quarterly, HR-Law Webinar was a great success, with over 150 registrants. Thank you to those who joined us…
17 Jun 2013
Federal Court of Appeal Rules on When Federal Employers Must Appoint a Workplace Violence Investigator (Demo)
The Canadian law on workplace violence and harassment continues to develop, particularly in relation to the duty to investigate. Employers…
22 Mar 2016
Off-Duty Drunk Driving Not Just Cause for Termination – Even for a Firefighter (Demo)
In Klonteig v West Kelowna (District), the British Columbia Superior Court found that an employer that terminated a firefighter for driving…
27 Jun 2018
The Accidental Termination (Demo)
A recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision highlights the importance of maintaining composure – and not venting frustrations upon employees….
15 Mar 2017
Honesty is the best policy – Court of Appeal upholds dishonest employee’s dismissal for just cause
Employers are often faced with the galling choice between asserting just cause for termination, and paying potentially large sums of…
19 Jun 2017
Moving Forward: Coronavirus and the New Normal (Demo)
By: Jeremy D. Schwartz, Ryan J. Conlin and Erika M. Montisano Most of Ontario’s public health units are now well…
22 Jul 2020
201701 Quarterly HR Law Webinar 04: Handling Employee Resignations
Allison discusses the difference between a valid and invalid resignation
24 Jan 2017