In a recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada, the Court dealt with the issue of awarding legal costs in a human rights complaint. This decision provides a good reminder to employers and employees of the significance of legal costs in such proceedings. Read about this decision and the practical implications in our Latest Update.
Jeremy D. Schwartz / About Author
Related Posts
Will this Ever End? Managing Return to Work in the Fourth Wave
Even as the world grapples with variants and what appears to be the fourth wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, employers…
24 Aug 2021
Fail to Plan? Plan to Fail. Pandemic Planning and Response for HR
The World Health Organization has declared COVID-19 a global pandemic. Not since H1N1 and SARS before that, have employers faced…
27 Mar 2020
Vaccine Mandates: The Courts and Arbitrators are Weighing In
Date: Dec 06, 2021 Vaccine mandates have been legally and politically controversial in Canada and around the world. We are…
06 Dec 2021
Human Rights Tribunal Finds that WSIB Discriminated Against an Injured Worker for Refusing to Provide Direct Deposit of Benefit Payments
An injured worker has succeeded in a human rights application against the Workplace Safety Insurance Board (“WSIB”). The case related to a…
26 Nov 2012
What you Need to Know About the New Voluntary Workplace Mental Health Standard
The Psychological Health and Safety in the Workplace – Prevention, promotion and guidance to staged implementation (the “Standard”) was released by the…
04 Jun 2013
OLRB opens the door to harassment reprisal complaints under the OHSA
The Ontario Labour Relations Board (“OLRB”) recently made an important decision which may represent a significant shift in how it…
08 Jan 2014
What is the next step in AODA compliance?
The AODA Employment Standard deadlines are not as far away as they may seem. The Employment Standard is one of…
26 May 2014
2014 Q3 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 3: Watershed Human Rights Decision
Frank Portman discusses a recent, significant decision from the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario concerning remedies and mental illness in…
14 Oct 2014
2015 Q1 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 2: Retirement and Terminations
Jessica Young explains the inherent risks associated with “encouraging” employees to retire.
21 Apr 2015
Register Now for our Complimentary, Quarterly HR-Law Webinar
Register Now! As always, our goal is to provide a concise, high-level summary of the most significant legal developments affecting…
07 Jul 2014
Divisional Court provides Guidance as to What Constitutes a Prima Facie Case of Discrimination
In a recent case, Peel Law Association v. Pieters, the Divisional Court overturned a decision of the Human Rights Tribunal finding…
06 Mar 2012
BC Labour Relations Board waters down Irving Pulp
Employers are still wrestling with the consequences of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision on the random drug and alcohol testing…
26 May 2014
Human Rights Tribunal Discourages Unnecessary Naming of Personal Respondents in Applications
In Sterling v Wendy’s Restaurant, the applicants (a former Wendy’s employee and his wife), named 14 personal respondents, who were members…
07 Sep 2011
2013 Q3 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 1: AODA Update
This is segment 1 of 5 from our Q3 webinar held on Thursday, October 10, “Upcoming AODA Obligations – What You Need…
12 Oct 2013
2020Q1 Complimentary Quarterly HR-Law Webinar
During this edition of Stringer LLP’s complimentary Quarterly HR-Law Webinar series, broadcast on Monday, January 20, 2020, Ryan Conlin, Jeremy Schwartz and Erika Montisano discussed…
20 Jan 2020