In a recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada, the Court dealt with the issue of awarding legal costs in a human rights complaint. This decision provides a good reminder to employers and employees of the significance of legal costs in such proceedings. Read about this decision and the practical implications in our Latest Update.
Jeremy D. Schwartz / About Author
Related Posts
Responding to human rights harassment complaints: Guidelines from the HRTO
You are an employer that has just received a harassment complaint from an employee. The complaint is against a valued…
28 Mar 2013
Long and Winding Road Managing Emerging Employment and OHS Issues in the COVID Transition
Employers have made their plans; they’ve hunkered down; and they’ve sheltered in place. As we traverse the long and winding…
11 Dec 2020
2014 Q4 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 4: Human Rights Forum Shopping
Jeremy Schwartz discusses the disturbing trend of employees forum shopping in human rights matters, and a recent HRTO decision which…
21 Jan 2015
When is an Owner an Employee? (Demo)
When is an owner also an “employee”? The Supreme Court of Canada recently rendered a decision on the question of…
24 Jun 2014
Think You Suffered Family Status Discrimination? First Things First – Were You Employed in Ontario or B.C.? (Demo)
The law governing family status discrimination under human rights legislation is unsettled and varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. A new…
16 Apr 2019
2014 Q3 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 3: Watershed Human Rights Decision
Frank Portman discusses a recent, significant decision from the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario concerning remedies and mental illness in…
14 Oct 2014
Human Rights Tribunal Rules on Family Status Protection for Infrequent and Unexpected Childcare Obligations (Demo)
A recent Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario decision confirms that family status protection may require employers to accommodate employees’ sporadic…
20 Apr 2016
Supreme Court Allows Employees to “Double-Up” on Pregnancy and Parental Benefits (Demo)
Supreme Court Allows Employees to “Double-Up” on Pregnancy and Parental Benefits A regular point of contention between unions and employers…
08 Dec 2014
WSIB Return to Work Decisions: Are they Binding on the Human Rights Tribunal? – Ryan Conlin (Demo)
WSIB Return to Work Decisions: Are they Binding on the Human Rights Tribunal? – Ryan Conlin
14 Sep 2010
Workplace Investigations – Will Yours Survive Tribunal Scrutiny? (Demo)
Workplace investigations have been an increasingly important topic for HR Professionals in the past few years. Employers have a duty…
28 Jul 2015
The Human Rights Tribunal Says No to Forum Shopping
It has been a year since the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola (“Figliola”). In…
08 Nov 2012
Will this Ever End? Managing Return to Work in the Fourth Wave
Even as the world grapples with variants and what appears to be the fourth wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, employers…
24 Aug 2021
Register Now for our 27th Annual Employers’ Conference, Labour & Employment Law Update 2013
Don’t Miss our 27th Annual Employers’ Conference: Labour & Employment Law Update 2013. Space is limited. Register Early! Topics Include:…
20 Aug 2013
When is an Owner an Employee?
When is an owner also an “employee”? The Supreme Court of Canada recently rendered a decision on the question of…
24 Jun 2014
WSIB RETURN TO WORK DECISIONS: ARE THEY BINDING ON THE HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL? (Demo)
The Boyce decision establishes that at least in some instances injured workers are free to attempt to concurrently pursue Human…
14 Sep 2010