HR Blog

HR Blog
WSIB loss of Earnings Benefits still offset against Wrongful Dismissal Damages in Ontario
|
Published on July 25, 2011 | |
Stringer LLP Admin |
In a recent decision, Jensen v. Schaeffler Canada Inc., the Ontario Superior Court of Justice reduced an employee’s pay in lieu of notice award for wrongful dismissal by the amount of WSIB loss of earnings received during the notice period.
This is not a new legal development in Ontario. The Ontario Court of Appeal came to the same conclusion in 1997, in White v. Viceroy Fluid Power International Inc.; though, that decision was under the precursor to the current Workplace Safety and Insurance Act, 1997 (then the “Worker’ Compensation Act“). Strangely, the Ontario Superior Court in Jensen did not reference White, which remains binding authority in Ontario, and instead relied on an Alberta Court of Appeal decision from 1985.
Also of note, the court found that a 15 month notice period would have been appropriate, but extended that period to 18 months, concluding that the employee’s physical limitations would make securing new employment more difficult. However, as the combination of statutory notice and severance and WSIB benefits received exceeded the amount of damages she was entitled to receive for the wrongful dismissal claim, she was owed no further pay in lieu of notice.
workers' compensation, wrongful dismissal litigation
Subscribe to Blog feed
Recent Blog
- Court Signals Summary Judgement Often Appropriate for Wrongful Dismissal Actions
- Minister Jason Kenney Announces changes to the Immigration System to Promote Canadian Labour Market
- Landmark Decision on Certification of ESA Class Actions and Constructive Dismissal
- OLRB rules on electrician exemption in construction regulation
- What Does the Crown Have to Prove in an OHSA Prosecution?
- The Supreme Court to Lay Down the Law on Random Alcohol Testing
- OLRB Directs Inspector to Produce Investigation Records
- Employer Successfully Defends a Charge of Failing to Report an Accident to WSIB
- Minor Change to the OLRB’s Rules of Procedure could have a Major Impact
- Debate Continues over Family Caregiver Leave
- Divisional Court provides Guidance as to What Constitutes a Prima Facie Case of Discrimination
- Forum Shopping a Growing Problem - Published in The Lawyers Weekly
- Bill 168 and Section 50 of the OHSA: Has the Labour Board Closed the Floodgates?
- Proposed Family Caregiver Leave goes through Second Reading
- British Columbia Court of Appeal upholds just cause dismissal
- The Latest on Forum Shopping: The Human Rights Tribunal is Considering Whether a WSIB Case Manager Decision is a “Proceeding”
- Employees in fiduciary relationships may be entitled to bonuses even upon breach of duties
- ONCA Upholds Brito but Quashes Punitive Award
- Invasion of Privacy in the Workplace Could Lead to Liability for Snooping Employees
- Human Rights Tribunal Heeding Clear Direction from Supreme Court
- Taking a Hard Line on Termination Entitlements Ends Up Costing More
Categories
- aoda
- class actions
- construction labour relations
- constructive dismissal
- disability benefits
- employment insurance
- employment law
- employment standards
- fiduciary duties
- first nations
- general litigation
- human rights
- immigration
- labour law
- occupational health and safety
- privacy
- restrictive covenants
- stringer llp announcements
- workers' compensation
- wrongful dismissal litigation


