Ryan Conlin of Stringer LLP discusses recent jurisprudence concerning random drug and alcohol testing in Canada (post-Irving).
Related Posts
As we mentioned in our SBH Update, a significant change under Bill 160 is the removal of the Injury & Disease…
The law in Canada regarding random drug and alcohol testing has been inconsistent for some time, with the Alberta and…
Technological advancements frequently outpace the law’s ability to respond to the challenges they create. With the click of a button,…
For years the term “Right to Work” state has been synonymous with jurisdictions in the American South, where unions have…
#MeToo has quickly caught wind as a widespread movement that sheds light on the prevalence of sexual assault and harassment,…
Date: Dec 06, 2021 Vaccine mandates have been legally and politically controversial in Canada and around the world. We are…
Most employers are likely familiar with the WSIB return to work process which often involves a WSIB employee attending at…
A recent decision, R v The Corporation of the City of Guelph et al.[1] provides a narrow interpretation of limitation periods in…
Frank Portman discusses occupational health and safety regulations, as applicable to employer social events.
By: Ryan Conlin In what appears to be a response to considerable confusion in the construction industry, Ontario’s Chief Prevention…
Allison Taylor will present this insightful webinar for the Ontario Bar Association on March 12. She will discuss related issues including leaves…
In a recent decision, General Motors of Canada Limited v. Johnson, the Ontario Court of Appeal provided clarity on an employee’s…
Jeremy Schwartz compares the results of two termination grievances arising out of racist and misogynistic tweets.
Controlling Costs in Defending Human Rights Complaints – Joe Morrison

