Allison Taylor explains the unfavourable result of a recent judicial review decision in Alberta concerning family status discrimination.
Related Posts
It has been a year since the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola (“Figliola”). In…
You are an employer that has just received a harassment complaint from an employee. The complaint is against a valued…
#MeToo has quickly caught wind as a widespread movement that sheds light on the prevalence of sexual assault and harassment,…
Employers are often unsure whether they have the right to ask for doctor’s notes (i.e. medical evidence) to justify employee…
As readers of our Blog and recent update are aware, the blockbuster Supreme Court decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola,…
After 19 years of protracted litigation, the Human Rights Tribunal of Alberta has now awarded a former employee of Mobil…
Controlling Costs in Defending Human Rights Complaints – Joe Morrison
By: Ryan Conlin and Frank Portman Human Rights Tribunals across the country have been issuing damage awards which have raised…
When is an owner also an “employee”? The Supreme Court of Canada recently rendered a decision on the question of…
Kelly McDermott and Jeremy Schwartz Effective July 1, 2010, the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario has made significant changes to…
Jeff Murray discusses a recent Alberta Court of Queens Bench decision that overturned an arbitration panel’s finding that Suncor’s random…
When employees allege harassment in human rights complaints, they often refer to the creation of a “poisoned work environment.” A…
Date: September 8, 2023 A New Brunswick court has rejected a supervisor’s attempt to blame his criminal non-compliance with OHS…
Frank Portman discusses a recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision which greatly increased the scope of general and other damages…
Most employers are likely familiar with the WSIB return to work process which often involves a WSIB employee attending at…