Ryan Conlin discusses the potentially watershed decision in R. v. Roofing Medics, in which the court commented that more personal defendants in health and safety prosecutions should face jail sentences.
Related Posts
As many readers are likely aware, the burden of proof is on an employer to establish “due diligence” in an…
Vivianne Ponce discusses new OHS awareness training requirements in Ontario
By: Ryan J. Conlin The Ontario Court of Appeal has sent a clear message that employers convicted of criminal negligence can expect…
Jeremy Schwartz discusses how to avoid and address workplace sexual harassment.
A new regulation under the Occupational Health and Safety Act (“OHSA”) requires that workers and supervisors are provided with basic health and safety…
By Ryan J. Conlin One of the most complex issues under Ontario OH&S law relates to determining which party on a…
The Ontario Court of Appeal has made it clear in a recent decision that it is illegal to hold a cellular phone…
In a relatively minor decision that may have significant implications, the Ontario Labour Relations Board (“OLRB”) has ordered Ministry of…
The Ontario Court of Appeal has made it clear in a recent decision that it is illegal to hold a cellular phone…
Frank discusses a recent landmark decision from the Supreme Court regarding a new test for stays of prosecutions for unconstitutional…
On September 4, 2020, Ryan and Jeremy discussed the legal tightrope in terms of employee attendance management, that employers must…
By Jessica Young Workplace harassment has been at the forefront of labour and employment law over the past several years,…
Labour & Employment Law Update 2011 View our Conference Brochure & Agenda. Click here to Register for the Program. Topics…
The Expert Panel appointed to conduct a detailed review of the entire occupational health and safety system has released its…
Don’t Miss our May 5th Seminar at the Sheraton Toronto Airport:

