In a recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada, the Court dealt with the issue of awarding legal costs in a human rights complaint. This decision provides a good reminder to employers and employees of the significance of legal costs in such proceedings. Read about this decision and the practical implications in our Latest Update.
Parador Support / About Author
Related Posts
Shift-Shopping Endorsement Upheld by Alberta Court
The Alberta Court of Queen’s bench recently reviewed the arbitrator’s decision in SMS Equipment, a case on which we have written before (see…
31 Mar 2015
Blame the Lawyer? Drawing Best Practices for In-House Counsel from the Jurisprudence (Demo)
By: Jeremy Schwartz and Amanda Boyce In-house counsel is often the unsung hero of a legal saga, having guided their…
14 Sep 2016
Addiction without compulsion: no defence to serious misconduct using the “hybrid” approach
The law on addiction has evolved over the years in arbitral jurisprudence. Earlier decisions treated illness as a mitigating factor…
03 Mar 2017
Allison Taylor Speaks to Canadian @HRReporter About Managing Disabled Employees
Tweet This Post Posted on Wednesday, July 6th, 2011 at 11:24 am Categories: Uncategorized.
16 Jul 2011
Responding to human rights harassment complaints: Guidelines from the HRTO
You are an employer that has just received a harassment complaint from an employee. The complaint is against a valued…
28 Mar 2013
2016 Q2 HR-Law Webinar Part 3: ONCA Upholds Landmark Retroactive Loss Award (Demo)
Jeremy Schwartz discusses a recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision that upheld a landmark retroactive loss of earnings award from…
19 Jul 2016
Long and Winding Road Managing Emerging Employment and OHS Issues in the COVID Transition (Demo)
Employers have made their plans; they’ve hunkered down; and they’ve sheltered in place. As we traverse the long and winding…
11 Dec 2020
It Takes Two to Tango: Superior Court Rules on Employees’ Duty to Facilitate in the Accommodation Process (Demo)
Employers have a duty to accommodate employees with disabilities to the point of undue hardship, including facilitating the return to…
16 May 2016
Supreme Court Allows Employees to “Double-Up” on Pregnancy and Parental Benefits
Supreme Court Allows Employees to “Double-Up” on Pregnancy and Parental Benefits A regular point of contention between unions and employers…
08 Dec 2014
The Human Rights Tribunal Says No to Forum Shopping
It has been a year since the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola (“Figliola”). In…
08 Nov 2012
Tribunal Awards Four Years’ Lost Wages to Job Applicant Who Lied About Immigration Status
The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the “Tribunal”) recently awarded $101,363.16, representing four years’ lost salary, and $15,000.00 for injury to dignity,…
24 Sep 2019
It Takes Two to Tango: Superior Court Rules on Employees’ Duty to Facilitate in the Accommodation Process
Employers have a duty to accommodate employees with disabilities to the point of undue hardship, including facilitating the return to…
16 May 2016
Drug Dependency and Denial: Alberta Court of Appeal Rules Denial not a Shield to Discipline
By: Landon Young and Jessica Young Employee addiction is a challenging topic for HR professionals. Under Canadian human rights legislation, drug…
27 Aug 2015
Releases Protect Employers from Human Rights Complaints – Landon Young and Jessica Young (Demo)
Releases Protect Employers from Human Rights Complaints – Landon Young and Jessica Young
12 Aug 2011
What is the next step in AODA compliance? (Demo)
The AODA Employment Standard deadlines are not as far away as they may seem. The Employment Standard is one of…
26 May 2014