Significant Changes to the Human Rights Tribunal’s Rules – Kelly McDermott and Jeremy Schwartz
Related Posts
Tweet This Post Posted on Wednesday, July 6th, 2011 at 11:24 am Categories: Uncategorized.
By: Jeremy Schwartz and Amanda Boyce In-house counsel is often the unsung hero of a legal saga, having guided their…
Employers are still wrestling with the consequences of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision on the random drug and alcohol testing…
In a recent application to the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario, the Tribunal found that an employer facing an economic…
Ontario’s Divisional Court recently confirmed that employers have a right to ask employees to undergo an Independent Medical Examination (“IME”)…
Perhaps now more than ever before, the lawyers at Stringer LLP have been deeply engaged, supporting clients who face significant,…
The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario has heard many cases brought by injured workers against the Workplace Safety and Insurance…
Frank Portman discusses a recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision which greatly increased the scope of general and other damages…
Discrimination Case Reversed by the Courts: Are we Entering a New Era? – Allison Taylor
Employers are often unsure whether they have the right to ask for doctor’s notes (i.e. medical evidence) to justify employee…
Perhaps now more than ever before, the lawyers at Stringer LLP have been deeply engaged, supporting clients who face significant,…
In this webinar, Ryan Conlin and Landon Young provided guidance for employers on how to respond to the legal challenges…
In another twist in the rapidly developing area of family status discrimination law, the Federal Court of Appeal recently released…
Most employers are likely familiar with the WSIB return to work process which often involves a WSIB employee attending at…
Ryan Conlin of Stringer LLP discusses recent jurisprudence concerning random drug and alcohol testing in Canada (post-Irving).

