Discrimination Case Reversed by the Courts: Are we Entering a New Era? – Allison Taylor
Related Posts
Supreme Court Allows Employees to “Double-Up” on Pregnancy and Parental Benefits A regular point of contention between unions and employers…
In British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola, a decision released in October 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada found that…
It is a good practice for employers to have employees sign a full and final release when their employment is…
Ryan Conlin discusses recent changes to the WSIB return to work
The AODA Employment Standard deadlines are not as far away as they may seem. The Employment Standard is one of…
In another twist in the rapidly developing area of family status discrimination law, the Federal Court of Appeal recently released…
Jeremy Schwartz discusses a recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision that upheld a landmark retroactive loss of earnings award from…
A recent Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario decision confirms that family status protection may require employers to accommodate employees’ sporadic…
In this webinar, Ryan Conlin and Landon Young provided guidance for employers on how to respond to the legal challenges…
Even as the world grapples with variants and what appears to be the fourth wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, employers…
Since the early 1980s, plaintiffs have been precluded from bringing court actions solely predicated on suffering discrimination or harassment under…
Date: Dec 06, 2021 Vaccine mandates have been legally and politically controversial in Canada and around the world. We are…
By: Landon Young and Jessica Young Employee addiction is a challenging topic for HR professionals. Under Canadian human rights legislation, drug…
It has been a year since the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola (“Figliola”). In…
Ryan Conlin of Stringer LLP discusses recent jurisprudence concerning random drug and alcohol testing in Canada (post-Irving).

