WSIB Return to Work Decisions: Are they Binding on the Human Rights Tribunal? – Ryan Conlin
Related Posts
Ryan Conlin of Stringer LLP discusses recent jurisprudence concerning random drug and alcohol testing in Canada (post-Irving).
By: Jeremy Schwartz The Ontario Court of Appeal (ONCA) has quashed an arbitration award which upheld a just cause termination. …
When is an owner also an “employee”? The Supreme Court of Canada recently rendered a decision on the question of…
Employers have a duty to accommodate employees with disabilities to the point of undue hardship, including facilitating the return to…
Since the Supreme Court decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola (“Figliola”), the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the…
Employers must accommodate employees with disabilities to the point of undue hardship under the Ontario Human Rights Code. The accommodation of…
Jessica Young explains the inherent risks associated with “encouraging” employees to retire.
As readers of our Blog and recent update are aware, the blockbuster Supreme Court decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola,…
Among the amendments to Ontario’s human rights system in the past few years was the creation of a summary hearings…
By: Ryan Conlin & Frank Portman In most jurisdictions in Canada, human rights legislation prohibits discrimination on the basis of…
The law governing family status discrimination under human rights legislation is unsettled and varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. A new…
Even as the world grapples with variants and what appears to be the fourth wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, employers…
By: Ryan Conlin & Frank Portman A recent case from Ontario’s Human Rights Tribunal is a stark reminder of how…
The Boyce decision establishes that at least in some instances injured workers are free to attempt to concurrently pursue Human…
Technological advancements frequently outpace the law’s ability to respond to the challenges they create. With the click of a button,…