The Boyce decision establishes that at least in some instances injured workers are free to attempt to concurrently pursue Human Rights Code remedies against their employer even if the WSIB has ruled in the employer’s favour with respect to whether work is suitable
Jeremy D. Schwartz / About Author
Related Posts
Is the Sky Falling? Family Status Discrimination and Shift Shopping
By: Ryan Conlin & Frank Portman In most jurisdictions in Canada, human rights legislation prohibits discrimination on the basis of…
07 Mar 2014
Supreme Court of Canada Rules in Favour of Postal Workers in Pay Equity Human Rights Decision (Demo)
The claim was filed 28 years ago by female employees of Canada Post with the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (the…
21 Nov 2011
Human Rights Tribunal Discourages Unnecessary Naming of Personal Respondents in Applications
In Sterling v Wendy’s Restaurant, the applicants (a former Wendy’s employee and his wife), named 14 personal respondents, who were members…
07 Sep 2011
Long and Winding Road Managing Emerging Employment and OHS Issues in the COVID Transition (Demo)
Employers have made their plans; they’ve hunkered down; and they’ve sheltered in place. As we traverse the long and winding…
11 Dec 2020
WSIB Return to Work Decisions: Are they Binding on the Human Rights Tribunal? – Ryan Conlin (Demo)
WSIB Return to Work Decisions: Are they Binding on the Human Rights Tribunal? – Ryan Conlin
14 Sep 2010
2016 Q2 HR-Law Webinar Part 5: ONCA on General Damages
Frank Portman discusses a recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision which greatly increased the scope of general and other damages…
19 Jul 2016
2020Q1 Complimentary Quarterly HR-Law Webinar (Demo)
During this edition of Stringer LLP’s complimentary Quarterly HR-Law Webinar series, broadcast on Monday, January 20, 2020, Ryan Conlin, Jeremy Schwartz and Erika Montisano discussed…
20 Jan 2020
Human Rights Tribunal Finds Discrimination in Request for Medical Information (Demo)
In Thompson v. 1552754 Ontario Inc., the applicant was employed as a counter person at the respondent’s coffee shop. The applicant…
24 May 2013
Human Rights Tribunal Heeding Clear Direction from Supreme Court (Demo)
In British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola, a decision released in October 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada found that…
25 Jan 2012
What you Need to Know About the New Voluntary Workplace Mental Health Standard (Demo)
The Psychological Health and Safety in the Workplace – Prevention, promotion and guidance to staged implementation (the “Standard”) was released by the…
04 Jun 2013
Human Rights Code Amended to Include Gender Identity (Demo)
The Ontario Human Rights Code (the “Code”) was recently amended to add “gender identity or gender expression” as a ground of discrimination….
31 Jul 2012
Back to Basics: HRTO Follows Figliola and Refuses to Allow Relitigation of WSIB Claim
In 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v Figliola (“Figliola”). The Figliola decision addressed the…
05 Dec 2014
What does “Disability” Actually Mean for Accommodation Purposes? (Demo)
The law is clear that an employer is required to accommodate employees with a “disability” up to the point of…
22 May 2013
Fail to Plan? Plan to Fail. Pandemic Planning and Response for HR (Demo)
The World Health Organization has declared COVID-19 a global pandemic. Not since H1N1 and SARS before that, have employers faced…
27 Mar 2020
BC Labour Relations Board waters down Irving Pulp (Demo)
Employers are still wrestling with the consequences of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision on the random drug and alcohol testing…
26 May 2014