The Boyce decision establishes that at least in some instances injured workers are free to attempt to concurrently pursue Human Rights Code remedies against their employer even if the WSIB has ruled in the employer’s favour with respect to whether work is suitable
Jeremy D. Schwartz / About Author
Related Posts
Has BC Court opened the door to more court claims of harassment?
Since the early 1980s, plaintiffs have been precluded from bringing court actions solely predicated on suffering discrimination or harassment under…
09 Apr 2019
What is a Reprisal under the Human Rights Code?
By: Ryan Conlin & Frank Portman A recent case from Ontario’s Human Rights Tribunal is a stark reminder of how…
08 Apr 2014
2016 Q2 HR-Law Webinar Part 3: ONCA Upholds Landmark Retroactive Loss Award (Demo)
Jeremy Schwartz discusses a recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision that upheld a landmark retroactive loss of earnings award from…
19 Jul 2016
2014 Q1 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 1: Alcohol & Drug Testing Update
Ryan Conlin of Stringer LLP discusses recent jurisprudence concerning random drug and alcohol testing in Canada (post-Irving).
22 Apr 2014
Allison Taylor Speaks to Canadian @HRReporter About Managing Disabled Employees (Demo)
Tweet This Post Posted on Wednesday, July 6th, 2011 at 11:24 am Categories: Uncategorized.
16 Jul 2011
Human Rights Tribunal Finds that WSIB Discriminated Against an Injured Worker for Refusing to Provide Direct Deposit of Benefit Payments (Demo)
An injured worker has succeeded in a human rights application against the Workplace Safety Insurance Board (“WSIB”). The case related to a…
26 Nov 2012
What does “Disability” Actually Mean for Accommodation Purposes?
The law is clear that an employer is required to accommodate employees with a “disability” up to the point of…
22 May 2013
Does Human Rights Legislation Apply to Job Ads on Facebook?
Technological advancements frequently outpace the law’s ability to respond to the challenges they create. With the click of a button,…
12 Apr 2019
Court Comments on when Employers can ask for an Independent Medical Examination (Demo)
Ontario’s Divisional Court recently confirmed that employers have a right to ask employees to undergo an Independent Medical Examination (“IME”)…
16 Aug 2017
Ontario Human Rights Tribunal Opening the Door to Duplicative Litigation? (Demo)
Since the Supreme Court decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola (“Figliola”), the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the…
11 Sep 2013
OLRB opens the door to harassment reprisal complaints under the OHSA (Demo)
The Ontario Labour Relations Board (“OLRB”) recently made an important decision which may represent a significant shift in how it…
08 Jan 2014
Divisional Court Clarifies Test for a Poisonous Work Environment
When employees allege harassment in human rights complaints, they often refer to the creation of a “poisoned work environment.” A…
16 Jan 2015
Does Human Rights Legislation Apply to Job Ads on Facebook? (Demo)
Technological advancements frequently outpace the law’s ability to respond to the challenges they create. With the click of a button,…
12 Apr 2019
What you Need to Know About the New Voluntary Workplace Mental Health Standard (Demo)
The Psychological Health and Safety in the Workplace – Prevention, promotion and guidance to staged implementation (the “Standard”) was released by the…
04 Jun 2013
Solid evidentiary burden to prove constructive dismissal due to poisoned work environment
In a recent decision, General Motors of Canada Limited v. Johnson, the Ontario Court of Appeal provided clarity on an employee’s…
14 Aug 2013