Frank Portman discusses a recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision which greatly increased the scope of general and other damages awarded in a wrongful dismissal action.
Related Posts
A recent decision, the Court of Appeal, Mady Development Corp. v. Rossetto, clarified an employee’s entitlement to bonuses who has breached…
Corporate restructuring is often accompanied by lawsuits by jilted employees claiming constructive dismissal. In a recent case, the Ontario Court…
The Ontario Superior Court recently allowed an employee to proceed with claims against his former employer regarding long-term disability insurance,…
As work patterns change in the modern era, the line between independent contractor and employee can often become blurry. A…
Ontario Court of Appeal Rules Non-Competition Clause Unenforceable – Allison Taylor
Employers be warned – engaging in high-handed, bullying behaviour when dismissing an employee may be a costly strategy. The Supreme…
Continuing to Work Following Changes to Employment Not Considered Acceptance of Changes – Joe Morrison
By: Landon Young and Jessica Young Does a terminated employee have a duty to accept an offer of re-employment after termination? This issue…
To be enforceable, non-competition agreements must, as a general rule, be reasonable and unambiguous in terms of their geographic scope,…
WSIB Return to Work Decisions: Are they Binding on the Human Rights Tribunal? – Ryan Conlin
Jeff Murray discusses a recent landmark contract decision from the Supreme Court of Canada
It is common practice for employers to offer departing employees, who are being terminated without cause, a separation package in…
Increasingly, the courts are striking down termination provisions in employment contracts resulting in lengthy common law notice awards to employees. …
Tweet This Post Posted on Wednesday, July 6th, 2011 at 11:24 am Categories: Uncategorized.

