Jeremy Schwartz discusses a recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision that upheld a landmark retroactive loss of earnings award from the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.
Parador Support / About Author
Related Posts
Gloves Come Off: Sky High Damages in Human Rights Cases
By: Ryan Conlin and Frank Portman Human Rights Tribunals across the country have been issuing damage awards which have raised…
05 Jun 2014
WSIB RETURN TO WORK DECISIONS: ARE THEY BINDING ON THE HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL?
The Boyce decision establishes that at least in some instances injured workers are free to attempt to concurrently pursue Human…
14 Sep 2010
Think You Suffered Family Status Discrimination? First Things First – Were You Employed in Ontario or B.C.? (Demo)
The law governing family status discrimination under human rights legislation is unsettled and varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. A new…
16 Apr 2019
Shift-Shopping Endorsement Upheld by Alberta Court
The Alberta Court of Queen’s bench recently reviewed the arbitrator’s decision in SMS Equipment, a case on which we have written before (see…
31 Mar 2015
Preferential Treatment for Employees with Active WSIB Claims not Discriminatory (Demo)
The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the “Tribunal”) recently held that it is not discriminatory for employers to treat disabled…
25 Oct 2017
The Human Rights Tribunal Says No to Forum Shopping (Demo)
It has been a year since the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola (“Figliola”). In…
08 Nov 2012
Allison Taylor Speaks to Canadian @HRReporter About Managing Disabled Employees (Demo)
Tweet This Post Posted on Wednesday, July 6th, 2011 at 11:24 am Categories: Uncategorized.
16 Jul 2011
Stress Claim Tsunami: New Approach to WSIB Stress Claims (Demo)
Ryan Conlin and Jeremy Schwartz discuss a landmark WSIAT decision which held sections of the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act…
29 May 2014
Solid evidentiary burden to prove constructive dismissal due to poisoned work environment (Demo)
In a recent decision, General Motors of Canada Limited v. Johnson, the Ontario Court of Appeal provided clarity on an employee’s…
14 Aug 2013
It Takes Two to Tango: Superior Court Rules on Employees’ Duty to Facilitate in the Accommodation Process
Employers have a duty to accommodate employees with disabilities to the point of undue hardship, including facilitating the return to…
16 May 2016
2013 Q4 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 3: WSIB & Forum Shopping (Demo)
Allison Taylor discusses recent decisions from the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario suggesting a disturbing trend in that tribunal permitting…
21 Jan 2014
WSIB RETURN TO WORK DECISIONS: ARE THEY BINDING ON THE HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL? (Demo)
The Boyce decision establishes that at least in some instances injured workers are free to attempt to concurrently pursue Human…
14 Sep 2010
Vaccine Mandates: The Courts and Arbitrators are Weighing In
Date: Dec 06, 2021 Vaccine mandates have been legally and politically controversial in Canada and around the world. We are…
06 Dec 2021
COVID-19: Lessons from the HR Trenches (Demo)
Perhaps now more than ever before, the lawyers at Stringer LLP have been deeply engaged, supporting clients who face significant,…
30 Jul 2020
Accommodating scent sensitivities in the workplace
Employers must accommodate employees with disabilities to the point of undue hardship under the Ontario Human Rights Code. The accommodation of…
15 Oct 2012