HR Blog
Director sentenced to jail time for failure to pay wages under the ESA
![]() |
Published on November 19, 2012 |
In a recent decision, the Ontario Court of Justice sentenced the director of six Ontario companies, Steven Blondin, to 90 days in jail for failing to pay wages to employees.
Mr. Blodin is the owner and operator of six companies, Steven’s Inc., Axcea International Inc., Automotive Containment Solutions Inc., Automotive CSI Inc., Automotive CSI-Alliston Inc., and Automotive CSI – Newmarket Inc., all of which were found by an Employment Standards officer (the “ESO”) to owe wages to employees. In total, there were 61 employee complaints across the six companies for unpaid wages between March 2007 and October 2009. The ESO issued 116 orders in total, amounting to over $125,000 in unpaid wages. The companies failed to comply with the orders.
Mr. Blodin and the six companies entered guilty pleas. Mr. Blodin was sentenced to 90 days in jail and fines of $280,000, in addition to the wages owing.
The news release contained the following quotation from the decision:
This sentence serves as a warning to those who believe they are above the law. Our government is committed to ensuring that all Ontarians are treated fairly at work, and we will continue to help ensure that Ontarians know their rights and responsibilities.
Under the Employment Standards Act, a director of a corporation is guilty of an offence if they fail to comply with an order of an ESO to pay wages (s. 136). Under this provision, the director’s liability, however, is limited to a fine of not more than $50,000 and does not include jail time. However, under s.137, if a director permits or acquiesces in an offence, they can be liable for a fine or imprisonment.
This certainly is not a typical result. As indicated in the above quotation, it seems that Mr. Blodin has been used to set an example for other employers who fail to comply with orders from an ESO. It goes without saying that employers should treat orders from an ESO seriously, if the employer decides not to pursue an appeal, they should not delay in complying with the order.
employment law, employment standards

Recent Blog
- Working Notice Inappropriate for Employees Who Cannot Work
- No Bonus Entitlement - “Active Employment” Requirement did not Violate ESA
- Stringer LLP - Prize in Labour Law
- Change is Coming: Bill 148: Fair Workplaces, Better Jobs Act Passes Third Reading
- Ambiguity Killed the Termination Clause
- Short Service Employee gets Four Months’ Pay in Lieu of Reasonable Notice
- Preferential Treatment for Employees with Active WSIB Claims not Discriminatory
- Overtime Averaging: No Notice, No Harm, No Foul
- Court Gives Guidance as to When OHSA Prosecutions May Lead to Jail Time
- Court Limits Bonus Entitlement During Notice Period
- Court of Appeal Rules on Employers’ Obligations to Protect Employees from Harassment and Violence when they are Away from the Workplace
- Court Rules that Rejected Separation Packages are to Remain Confidential
- Can a Defendant be Charged Criminally After Pleading Guilty to OHSA Charges?
- Avoid Procedural Missteps when Accommodating Mental Disabilities in the Workplace
- British Columbia to Reinstate Human Rights Commission
- Court Comments on when Employers can ask for an Independent Medical Examination
- Smoked Out: Employer Convicted When Employee Smokes in Truck
- Court Awards Significant Costs Award Against Thieving Employee
- Minimizing Mitigation: Court of Appeal gives employee benefit of the doubt
- Honesty is the best policy - Court of Appeal upholds dishonest employee’s dismissal for just cause
- Bad facts make bad law (for employers): Court recognizes new tort of harassment
- Mitigating by returning to work: it depends on the circumstances
- Is it work-related? Novel workers’ compensation decisions deal with harassment and assault
- Private member’s Bill seeks union-favourable amendments, without waiting for the Changing Workplaces Review
- Generous termination clauses: Think twice before making promises
- May 3 - Ryan and Jeremy to Present on Marijuana in the Workplace at WSPS Conference
- Using independent contractor not a “get out of jail free” card
- Constructive dismissal? A question of interpretation
- March 31 - Last day for early bird registration
- The Accidental Termination
- Addiction without compulsion: no defence to serious misconduct using the “hybrid” approach
- Probationary clauses: A double-edged sword for employers
- No evidence? No aggravated damages – Employees must prove basis for damages based on manner of dismissal
- Alberta court rules on the limits of good faith in the performance of employment contracts
- When a resignation isn’t really a resignation
- “Uncommon” employers – Corporate Structure vs Employment Obligations
Categories
- accessibility for ontarians with disabilities act
- aoda
- class actions
- constitutional law
- construction labour relations
- constructive dismissal
- disability benefits
- employment contracts
- employment insurance
- employment law
- employment litigation
- employment standards
- fiduciary duties
- first nations
- general litigation
- human rights
- immigration
- labour law
- labour relations
- occupational health and safety
- privacy
- stringer llp
- stringer llp announcements
- workers compensation
- workers' compensation
- wrongful dismissal litigation