The Boyce decision establishes that at least in some instances injured workers are free to attempt to concurrently pursue Human Rights Code remedies against their employer even if the WSIB has ruled in the employer’s favour with respect to whether work is suitable
Related Posts
The Ontario Labour Relations Board (“OLRB”) recently made an important decision which may represent a significant shift in how it…
Kelly McDermott and Jeremy Schwartz Effective July 1, 2010, the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario has made significant changes to…
Tweet This Post Posted on Wednesday, July 6th, 2011 at 11:24 am Categories: Uncategorized.
Amanda Boyce discusses accommodation obligations for non-Christian observers.
Even as the world grapples with variants and what appears to be the fourth wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, employers…
In Thompson v. 1552754 Ontario Inc., the applicant was employed as a counter person at the respondent’s coffee shop. The applicant…
Employers must accommodate employees with disabilities to the point of undue hardship under the Ontario Human Rights Code. The accommodation of…
After 19 years of protracted litigation, the Human Rights Tribunal of Alberta has now awarded a former employee of Mobil…
When is an owner also an “employee”? The Supreme Court of Canada recently rendered a decision on the question of…
Frank Portman discusses a recent, significant decision from the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario concerning remedies and mental illness in…
Canadian employers have been confronted with a veritable ocean of new government programs, which are designed to help weather the…
By: Jeremy Schwartz and Frank Portman We have written before on the decision of the Federal Court of Appeal in Johnstone…
Frank Portman discusses a recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision which greatly increased the scope of general and other damages…
The Boyce decision establishes that at least in some instances injured workers are free to attempt to concurrently pursue Human…
The Ontario Human Rights Code (the “Code”) was recently amended to add “gender identity or gender expression” as a ground of discrimination….

