The Boyce decision establishes that at least in some instances injured workers are free to attempt to concurrently pursue Human Rights Code remedies against their employer even if the WSIB has ruled in the employer’s favour with respect to whether work is suitable
Related Posts
Alberta Human Rights Tribunal Awards Employee $650,000 – Kelly McDermott
By: Ryan Conlin & Frank Portman In most jurisdictions in Canada, human rights legislation prohibits discrimination on the basis of…
The law is clear that an employer is required to accommodate employees with a “disability” up to the point of…
WSIB Return to Work Decisions: Are they Binding on the Human Rights Tribunal? – Ryan Conlin
Allison Taylor discusses progressive discipline and termination for employee misconduct.
WSIB Return to Work Decisions: Are they Binding on the Human Rights Tribunal? – Ryan Conlin
Even as the world grapples with variants and what appears to be the fourth wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, employers…
Even as the world grapples with variants and what appears to be the fourth wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, employers…
Stringer LLP and First Reference are proud to host the 16th Annual Ontario Employment Law Conference in Mississauga. We invite business owners and…
Don’t Miss our 27th Annual Employers’ Conference: Labour & Employment Law Update 2013. Space is limited. Register Early! Topics Include:…
In Sterling v Wendy’s Restaurant, the applicants (a former Wendy’s employee and his wife), named 14 personal respondents, who were members…
Date: Mar 04. 2022 The Omicron wave appears to be receding and there is cautious optimism that the worst of…
The Alberta Court of Queen’s bench recently reviewed the arbitrator’s decision in SMS Equipment, a case on which we have written before (see…
Tweet This Post Posted on Wednesday, July 6th, 2011 at 11:24 am Categories: Uncategorized.
In 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v Figliola (“Figliola”). The Figliola decision addressed the…