The Boyce decision establishes that at least in some instances injured workers are free to attempt to concurrently pursue Human Rights Code remedies against their employer even if the WSIB has ruled in the employer’s favour with respect to whether work is suitable
Related Posts
Jeremy Schwartz discusses a recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision that upheld a landmark retroactive loss of earnings award from…
Perhaps now more than ever before, the lawyers at Stringer LLP have been deeply engaged, supporting clients who face significant,…
Employers are often unsure whether they have the right to ask for doctor’s notes (i.e. medical evidence) to justify employee…
Hypothetical Standards: Human Rights Tribunal finds Police Liable for Racism – Jeremy Schwartz
Most employers are likely familiar with the WSIB return to work process which often involves a WSIB employee attending at…
Allison Taylor discusses recent decisions from the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario suggesting a disturbing trend in that tribunal permitting…
Among the amendments to Ontario’s human rights system in the past few years was the creation of a summary hearings…
The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the “Tribunal”) recently held that it is not discriminatory for employers to treat disabled…
Since the Supreme Court decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola (“Figliola”), the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the…
Jessica Young explains the inherent risks associated with “encouraging” employees to retire.
Obese Resident Awarded Preferred Parking Space – Jeremy D. Schwartz
Discrimination Case Reversed by the Courts: Are we Entering a New Era? – Allison Taylor
The Boyce decision establishes that at least in some instances injured workers are free to attempt to concurrently pursue Human…
Tweet This Post Posted on Wednesday, July 6th, 2011 at 11:24 am Categories: Uncategorized.

