Jeff Murray discusses a recent Alberta Court of Queens Bench decision that overturned an arbitration panel’s finding that Suncor’s random drug and alcohol testing policy was unenforceable.
Related Posts
The AODA Employment Standard deadlines are not as far away as they may seem. The Employment Standard is one of…
Effective Management of Long-Term Disabled Employees: How to Navigate the Legal Minefield. Please join us at the Delta Toronto Airport…
This is segment 1 of 5 from our Q3 webinar held on Thursday, October 10, “Upcoming AODA Obligations – What You Need…
A critical element of the health and safety regime in any workplace that employs heavy machinery is the presence of…
By: Ryan Conlin & Jeremy Schwartz The Ontario Government has proposed legislation which would dramatically alter the legal landscape with respect to…
After 19 years of protracted litigation, the Human Rights Tribunal of Alberta has now awarded a former employee of Mobil…
The law governing family status discrimination under human rights legislation is unsettled and varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. A new…
Just over a year ago, the workplace violence and harassment provisions were added to the Occupational Health and Safety Act. Although…
Contracts of all kinds often fall apart over relatively minor details, despite the parties’ agreement on the majority of issues. …
A recent decision, R v The Corporation of the City of Guelph et al.[1] provides a narrow interpretation of limitation periods in…
An injured worker has succeeded in a human rights application against the Workplace Safety Insurance Board (“WSIB”). The case related to a…
Ryan Conlin of Stringer LLP discusses recent jurisprudence concerning random drug and alcohol testing in Canada (post-Irving).
In a long awaited ruling, the Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Ontario (Attorney General) v. Fraser. In…
On September 4, 2020, Ryan and Jeremy discussed the legal tightrope in terms of employee attendance management, that employers must…
The saga of Ontario (Ministry of Labour) v. JR Contracting Property Services, Lootawan and Haniff (case 1) has finally come to its…

