Jeff Murray discusses a recent Alberta Court of Queens Bench decision that overturned an arbitration panel’s finding that Suncor’s random drug and alcohol testing policy was unenforceable.
Related Posts
One of the most interesting questions that arose after the Bill C-45 amendments to the Criminal Code, is whether a defendant…
By Ryan Conlin and Jeremy Schwartz A New Brunswick Court has issued one of the most significant Criminal Code judgments…
The law has become increasingly sensitive to the need for the protection of personal information from public disclosure. This is…
By: Ryan Conlin & Frank Portman In most jurisdictions in Canada, human rights legislation prohibits discrimination on the basis of…
Technological advancements frequently outpace the law’s ability to respond to the challenges they create. With the click of a button,…
In Thompson v. 1552754 Ontario Inc., the applicant was employed as a counter person at the respondent’s coffee shop. The applicant…
A revised Bill 160 was passed on June 1st. Notable changes to the Bill include an increase in the role…
Ryan Conlin discusses the potentially watershed decision in R. v. Roofing Medics, in which the court commented that more personal…
The law in Canada regarding random drug and alcohol testing has been inconsistent for some time, with the Alberta and…
An injured worker has succeeded in a human rights application against the Workplace Safety Insurance Board (“WSIB”). The case related to a…
For years the term “Right to Work” state has been synonymous with jurisdictions in the American South, where unions have…
By: Jeff Murray The Ontario Court of Appeal recently called “strike two” on Imperial Oil’s long-standing effort to conduct random…
Frank Portman discusses a recent, significant decision from the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario concerning remedies and mental illness in…
Jeff Murray discusses a recent landmark contract decision from the Supreme Court of Canada

