Employers who only provide the minimum amounts required by employment standards legislation after termination are gambling. Sometimes this approach can result in cost savings, but it can also end in a costly damages and legal costs award as occurred in the case of Brito v. Canac Kitchens. Read our Latest Update for more information about the case, and what to do to protect your organization from such awards.
Parador Support / About Author
Related Posts
Employer Hit Hard for Discontinuing Disability Benefits Shortly After Termination
Employers who only provide the minimum amounts required by employment standards legislation after termination are gambling. Sometimes this approach can…
Stress Claim Tsunami: New Approach to WSIB Stress Claims
Ryan Conlin and Jeremy Schwartz discuss a landmark WSIAT decision which held sections of the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act…
29 May 2014
Addiction without compulsion: no defence to serious misconduct using the “hybrid” approach
The law on addiction has evolved over the years in arbitral jurisprudence. Earlier decisions treated illness as a mitigating factor…
03 Mar 2017
201701 Quarterly HR Law Webinar 02: Bonus Eligibility During the Notice Period (Demo)
Amanda discusses the law on bonus eligibility during the reasonable notice period
24 Jan 2017
Employees in fiduciary relationships may be entitled to bonuses even upon breach of duties
A recent decision, the Court of Appeal, Mady Development Corp. v. Rossetto, clarified an employee’s entitlement to bonuses who has breached…
14 Feb 2012
Shifting Sands: Ontario Court of Appeal Upholds Termination Clause (Demo)
Employers, ever-weary of the next judicial pronouncement on the enforceability of specific termination clauses in employment contracts, may mark a…
28 Feb 2018
Court Strikes Down Release Signed on Termination (Demo)
Ontario’s Superior Court of Justice recently struck down a release signed at a termination meeting. Read more about this interesting…
18 Jun 2012
COVID-19: Lessons from the HR Trenches (Demo)
Perhaps now more than ever before, the lawyers at Stringer LLP have been deeply engaged, supporting clients who face significant,…
30 Jul 2020
Rehiring Former Employees: Avoiding the Risk of “Continuous Employment” – Allison Taylor
Rehiring Former Employees: Avoiding the Risk of “Continuous Employment” – Allison Taylor
03 Mar 2010
2015 Q1 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 3: Social Media in the Workplace (Demo)
Jeremy Schwartz compares the results of two termination grievances arising out of racist and misogynistic tweets.
21 Apr 2015
Compliance with the new Employment Standard under AODA – Jessica Young (Demo)
Compliance with the new Employment Standard under AODA – Jessica Young
22 Jul 2011
Take It or Leave It: How NOT to Change Terms in an Employment Contract – Greg McGinnis and Jeremy Schwartz
Take It or Leave It: How NOT to Change Terms in an Employment Contract – Greg McGinnis and Jeremy Schwartz
23 Jun 2008
Solid evidentiary burden to prove constructive dismissal due to poisoned work environment (Demo)
In a recent decision, General Motors of Canada Limited v. Johnson, the Ontario Court of Appeal provided clarity on an employee’s…
14 Aug 2013
Terra Firma No More: Supreme Court Changes the Ground Rules on Contracts (Demo)
By: Jeremy D. Schwartz and Frank B. Portman The recent Supreme Court decision in Sattva Capital Corp v Creston Moly Corp …
29 Sep 2014
Unionizing Foodora: Adapting Labour Law to the Gig Economy (Demo)
The Ontario Labour Relations Board (the “Board”) has issued a landmark decision which clears the path for Foodora couriers to…
28 Feb 2020