The Boyce decision establishes that at least in some instances injured workers are free to attempt to concurrently pursue Human Rights Code remedies against their employer even if the WSIB has ruled in the employer’s favour with respect to whether work is suitable
Parador Support / About Author
Related Posts
Holiday Webinar 3: Harassment (Demo)
Jeremy Schwartz discusses how to avoid and address workplace sexual harassment.
21 Dec 2016
Human Rights Tribunal Finds Discrimination in Request for Medical Information
In Thompson v. 1552754 Ontario Inc., the applicant was employed as a counter person at the respondent’s coffee shop. The applicant…
24 May 2013
Fail to Plan? Plan to Fail. Pandemic Planning and Response for HR
The World Health Organization has declared COVID-19 a global pandemic. Not since H1N1 and SARS before that, have employers faced…
27 Mar 2020
Solid evidentiary burden to prove constructive dismissal due to poisoned work environment
In a recent decision, General Motors of Canada Limited v. Johnson, the Ontario Court of Appeal provided clarity on an employee’s…
14 Aug 2013
SCC Weighs in on Costs Awards in Human Rights Complaints (Demo)
In a recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada, the Court dealt with the issue of awarding legal costs…
01 Nov 2011
Discrimination Case Reversed by the Courts: Are we Entering a New Era? – Allison Taylor (Demo)
Discrimination Case Reversed by the Courts: Are we Entering a New Era? – Allison Taylor
14 Mar 2011
Accommodating scent sensitivities in the workplace (Demo)
Employers must accommodate employees with disabilities to the point of undue hardship under the Ontario Human Rights Code. The accommodation of…
15 Oct 2012
WSIB Return to Work Decisions: Are they Binding on the Human Rights Tribunal? – Ryan Conlin (Demo)
WSIB Return to Work Decisions: Are they Binding on the Human Rights Tribunal? – Ryan Conlin
14 Sep 2010
Long and Winding Road Managing Emerging Employment and OHS Issues in the COVID Transition
Employers have made their plans; they’ve hunkered down; and they’ve sheltered in place. As we traverse the long and winding…
11 Dec 2020
2016 Q2 HR-Law Webinar Part 5: ONCA on General Damages (Demo)
Frank Portman discusses a recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision which greatly increased the scope of general and other damages…
19 Jul 2016
Blame the Lawyer? Drawing Best Practices for In-House Counsel from the Jurisprudence
By: Jeremy Schwartz and Amanda Boyce In-house counsel is often the unsung hero of a legal saga, having guided their…
14 Sep 2016
Drug Dependency and Denial: Alberta Court of Appeal Rules Denial not a Shield to Discipline (Demo)
By: Landon Young and Jessica Young Employee addiction is a challenging topic for HR professionals. Under Canadian human rights legislation, drug…
27 Aug 2015
What mental capacity is required to sign a release?
In a past Stringer Update, Releases Protect Employers from Human Rights Complaints, we emphasized the importance of having terminated employees sign…
11 Oct 2012
Human Rights Tribunal Discourages Unnecessary Naming of Personal Respondents in Applications
In Sterling v Wendy’s Restaurant, the applicants (a former Wendy’s employee and his wife), named 14 personal respondents, who were members…
07 Sep 2011
Rising Tide of Human Rights Damages
Ryan Conlin and Frank Portman discuss the disturbing trend of increasingly large general damages awards in human rights litigation.
25 Jun 2014