The Boyce decision establishes that at least in some instances injured workers are free to attempt to concurrently pursue Human Rights Code remedies against their employer even if the WSIB has ruled in the employer’s favour with respect to whether work is suitable
Related Posts
Technological advancements frequently outpace the law’s ability to respond to the challenges they create. With the click of a button,…
Tweet This Post Posted on Wednesday, July 6th, 2011 at 11:24 am Categories: Uncategorized.
WSIB Return to Work Decisions: Are they Binding on the Human Rights Tribunal? – Ryan Conlin
Employers are often unsure whether they have the right to ask for doctor’s notes (i.e. medical evidence) to justify employee…
Obese Resident Awarded Preferred Parking Space – Jeremy D. Schwartz
Most employers are likely familiar with the WSIB return to work process which often involves a WSIB employee attending at…
An office holiday party is a great time to unwind as a team and encourage a sense of community. Unfortunately,…
Perhaps now more than ever before, the lawyers at Stringer LLP have been deeply engaged, supporting clients who face significant,…
Controlling Costs in Defending Human Rights Complaints – Joe Morrison
Supreme Court Allows Employees to “Double-Up” on Pregnancy and Parental Benefits A regular point of contention between unions and employers…
Canadian employers have been confronted with a veritable ocean of new government programs, which are designed to help weather the…
Employers are often unsure whether they have the right to ask for doctor’s notes (i.e. medical evidence) to justify employee…
Jessica Young discusses a recent record setting human rights damages award.
Don’t Miss our 27th Annual Employers’ Conference: Labour & Employment Law Update 2013. Space is limited. Register Early! Topics Include:…
Employers must accommodate employees with disabilities to the point of undue hardship under the Ontario Human Rights Code. The accommodation of…