|Published on April 23, 2012||Stringer LLP Admin|
The Ontario Labour Relations Board (OLRB) has ruled that a worker does not have to be a certified or apprentice electrician to interconnect solar panels using “plug-and-play” electrical connectors. This interesting decision will have far-reaching implications for the Solar Industry and probably for other industries as well in which similar connectors are utilized or may be developed.
In IBEW Local 530, Applicant v. Gil & Sons Limited, Fil Savoia, Regional Director and First Solar Development (Canada) Inc., the IBEW appealed a Ministry of Labour Inspector’s decision not to issue an order compelling Gil & Sons Limited to permit only certified or apprentice electricians to interconnect photovoltaic (solar) modules and panels. A worker was injured on a project when he apparently failed to utilize appropriate PPE and to take other steps to ensure he was working in a safe manner.
The only issue in the appeal was whether the receptacle portion of an MC4 Plug-In Connector (colloquially referred to as a “plug-and-play connector“) is a “convenience receptacle” within the meaning of section 182 of the Construction Projects regulation under the Occupational Health and Safety Act (the “Regulation”). The Regulation provides that only a certified or apprentice electrician may connect an electrical device to a power source unless the connection is made into a “convenience receptacle”. The injured worker was working with an MC4 Plug-In Connector when he suffered a severe electrical shock.
MC4 Plug-In Connectors are designed so that the electrical contacts are in-set within the casings, so they are considered “finger-safe”. When the connector and receptacle ends are mated there is an audible “click,” the mated connection is waterproof, and the two ends cannot be undone without utilizing a special tool.
The IBEW asserted that the exemption in the Regulation was only intended to apply to low-voltage connectors used for household appliances, for example, and that certain changes to the language in the Regulation supported that conclusion.
The OLRB rejected that argument and ruled that the MC4 Plug-In Connector is a “convenience receptacle” within the meaning of the Regulation, and so the exemption applied. The OLRB held that if the Legislature had intended to limit the meaning of “convenience receptacle” based on its use or voltage involved, it could have done so.
The precedential effect of the decision could be significant. For example, many contractors bound to IBEW collective agreements have ‘agreed’ to use certified and apprentice electricians for the work in question. This would not relieve them of any existing obligations – but it could spur some interesting discussions in bargaining, as unionized contractors may face significant competitive disadvantages against their non-union counterparts.
Moreover, for union and non-union solar contractors, as solar products are developed using the MC4 Plug-in Connectors for other aspects of the work currently only performed by certified or apprentice electricians (i.e. connections into inverters), it may be possible for other work to be performed under the exemption. For better or for worse, this decision may spur innovation in the solar industry and others in which use of similar technology is possible.
- AODA Compliance Deadlines for January 2014 are Quickly Approaching
- Ministry of Labour Announces New Training Requirements
- SCC Protects Union Rights to Strike-Related Activity over Public Privacy Legislation
- Two Kicks at the Can: Worker Allowed to Re-litigate WSIB Accommodation Dispute at the Human Rights Tribunal
- Ontario Ministry of Labour announces safety blitz on recycling and waste hazards
- Review Court Bars Wrongful Dismissal Claim Post-ESA Claim
- Contractors Must Ensure Worker Safety at Customer Work Sites
- Register Now for our Complimentary Quarterly HR-Law Webinar - Q3
- Ontario Ministry of Labour blitz of the retail industry – Are you ESA compliant?
- “Holding” Means What It Says: Court of Appeal Rejects Narrow Interpretation of Ban on Holding Cell Phones While Driving
- Failure to Mitigate proves Costly to Plaintiff in Constructive Dismissal
- Ontario Human Rights Tribunal Opening the Door to Duplicative Litigation?
- Confidentiality Clause has Teeth: Police Officer forced to Return Settlement Funds
- MOL Prosecution Continues Amidst CCAA Proceedings
- Summary Judgement Not Always Appropriate in Wrongful Dismissal Actions
- Register Now for our 27th Annual Employers' Conference, Labour & Employment Law Update 2013
- Solid evidentiary burden to prove constructive dismissal due to poisoned work environment
- Can an Arbitrator Award Damages Against an Employer for Making False Statements to the WSIB?
- Save the Date! Don't Miss our Annual Employers' Conference
- Upcoming AODA Obligations – Are you ready?
- “Rocket Docket” to Summary Judgment in “Without Cause” Wrongful Dismissal Cases
- Appeal Court Finds Compensation for Loss During Notice Period Trumps Shareholders’ Agreement
- ONCA Confirms NO Fault-Based Workers' Compensation Grievances
- When is a Laid off Employee Still an Employee? When he Signs a Construction Union Membership Card
- Announcing our Complimentary Quarterly HR-Law Webinar (Q2)
- Court Holds That Smell of Marijuana in a Vehicle Does Not Justify Drug Testing Under OH&S Legislation
- What you Need to Know About the New Voluntary Workplace Mental Health Standard
- Human Rights Tribunal Finds Discrimination in Request for Medical Information
- What does “Disability” Actually Mean for Accommodation Purposes?
- Court of Appeal Case Shows Risks of Gaps in WSIB Coverage of Executives
- Specific Termination Provision Upheld After Sale of Business
- Discipline Warranted for Work Refusal Complaint Not Made in Good Faith
- Dealing effectively with OHS inspectors
- AODA compliance: Benefits of Being Ahead of the Game
- Responding to human rights harassment complaints: Guidelines from the HRTO
- How NOT to Draft an Enforceable Non-Competition Agreement
- So Your AODA Customer Service Standard Report is Past Due?
- Announcing our Complimentary Quarterly Roundup Webinar
- New Developments in Immigration Law for Skilled Trades
- New Employment Contract Term Triggers Constructive Dismissal
- Registration Now Open - Managing the Employment Lifecycle Webinar Series
- Where WSIB Benefits Denied Civil Claim May Proceed
- Alberta Human Rights Tribunal Awards Five Years of Back Pay and Reinstatement
- Stringer LLP Obtains $100K Retroactive NEER Adjustment in WSIAT Appeal
- Ontario Court of Appeal Overturns Blue Mountain Accident Reporting Decision
- Make Sure Pre-Employment Screening is Complete Before they Start
- Split Hairs and Sector Disputes
- Early Bird Registration is now open for First Reference's Ontario Employment Law Conference
- Early Morning OLRB Ruling Finds Teachers' Planned Day of Protest an Illegal Strike
- Court of Appeal Protects Manager from Personal Liability on Employee Termination
- accessibility for ontarians with disabilities act
- accessibility policies
- class actions
- constitutional law
- construction labour relations
- constructive dismissal
- disability benefits
- employment insurance
- employment law
- employment standards
- employment standards act
- fiduciary duties
- first nations
- general litigation
- human rights
- integrated accessibility standard
- labour law
- labour relations
- ministry of labour
- occupational health and safety
- restrictive covenants
- retail blitz
- section 45.1
- stringer llp announcements
- workers' compensation
- wrongful dismissal litigation