|Published on March 14, 2016||Stringer LLP Admin|
Recently, the Protecting Child Performers Act, 2015 came into force. The Act outlines protections for child performers in both the live entertainment and recorded entertainment industries.
This legislation applies to live performances including theatre, dance, music, opera or circus performances and broadly to recorded performances, which includes visual or audio-visual recorded entertainment for cinemas, the internet, on the radio, television broadcasts, or on DVD or similar devices.
The protections set out in the Act cover employment standards and occupational health and safety requirements including hours of work, breaks, overtime, and work refusals. For instance, the Act places restrictions on the hours that a child performer can work in a day, which increase with the age of the performer. The Act also provides the right for the child’s parent, guardian or chaperone to refuse work for a child under 14 years of age. The legislation also has requirements pertaining to overnight travel, tutoring, income protection, and healthy food.
The Act relies on the enforcement mechanisms found in the Employment Standards Act, 2000 (“ESA”) and the Occupational Health and Safety Act (“OHSA”), with the ESA enforcement provisions applying to the employment standards requirements of the Act and the OHSA enforcement provisions applying to the health and safety requirements.
Organizations in the entertainment industry should ensure they are familiar with and adhere to these new requirements, which impose more stringent standards in relation to some employment standards requirements including hours of work. The Act does include a “greater right or protection” provision similar to the “greater right or benefit” provision found in the ESA. This means that where an employment contract, collective agreement or other act provides a greater right or protection to a child performer then it will prevail. Organizations seeking to rely on the “greater right or protection” provision should seek legal advice in order to ensure that the Act is not being violated.
This blog was first published on First Reference Talks.
- Mitigation – A duty to act in your own professional interest
- Medical Evidence and Employee Absences
- Happy Holidays
- Employers Need “Reasonable Basis” to Allege Just Cause
- The Tail Wags the Dog: Federal Sector Employee Vetoes Employer`s Appointment of Investigator
- Re-Balancing the Express Entry System – IRCC puts the focus on human capital, skills and experience
- Landon Young named to the Best Lawyers in Canada 2017 list
- Supreme Court Decision May Protect Defendants Charged with OHSA Offences from Unreasonable Delay
- AODA Customer Service Standard Changed July 1
- Court of Appeal Gives Mark-Fabricating Teacher an "F"
- Putting on the Brakes: The Limits of the Common Employer Doctrine
- After the Accident: Pitfalls to Avoid for Employers after Workplace Accidents
- It Takes Two to Tango: Superior Court Rules on Employees’ Duty to Facilitate in the Accommodation Process
- Ryan Conlin Speaking on OHS in the Daily Commercial News
- More Time, More Money: New, Unique Employment Standards Act Leaves Proposed by Legislature
- Fixed-Term Fiasco: Employee Profits off of Termination of Term Contract
- Human Rights Tribunal Rules on Family Status Protection for Infrequent and Unexpected Childcare Obligations
- Employer Liable for Disclosure of Employee Confidential Medical and Employment Information
- Yes, the AODA Applies to Construction Employers
- Federal Court of Appeal Rules on When Federal Employers Must Appoint a Workplace Violence Investigator
- New Protections for Children in the Entertainment Industry
- Tip Protection for Servers – New Changes to the ESA
- DNF: Waiver Fails to Protect Self-Insured Employer from Injured Employee’s Court Action
- New Limits on Criminal Records Checks
- Probationary Panacea: Divisional Court Affirms Rights of Employers to Dismiss Probationary Employees without Reasonable Notice
- Ryan Conlin Speaks to the National Post re Metron
- Judge Imposes Jail Time on Metron Construction Site Supervisor
- Jumping to Conclusions Proves Costly for Employer
- accessibility for ontarians with disabilities act
- class actions
- constitutional law
- construction labour relations
- constructive dismissal
- disability benefits
- employment insurance
- employment law
- employment litigation
- employment standards
- fiduciary duties
- first nations
- general litigation
- human rights
- labour law
- labour relations
- occupational health and safety
- stringer llp
- stringer llp announcements
- workers' compensation
- wrongful dismissal litigation