Employers who only provide the minimum amounts required by employment standards legislation after termination are gambling. Sometimes this approach can result in cost savings, but it can also end in a costly damages and legal costs award as occurred in the case of Brito v. Canac Kitchens. Read our Latest Update for more information about the case, and what to do to protect your organization from such awards.
Parador Support / About Author
Related Posts
If it Looks Like Theft and Quacks Like Theft…the Employer may Still pay (Demo)
While employee theft is frequently grounds for termination, shades of grey do appear in the case law. In a recent…
09 Sep 2014
Generous termination clauses: Think twice before making promises (Demo)
Many employers include termination clauses in employment contracts to limit their liability when dismissing employees. When employers draft generous termination…
28 Apr 2017
Keeping the Offer on the Table Essential to Mitigation Defence
Corporate restructuring is often accompanied by lawsuits by jilted employees claiming constructive dismissal. In a recent case, the Ontario Court…
26 May 2014
Holiday Webinar 4: Employee Discipline
Allison Taylor discusses progressive discipline and termination for employee misconduct.
21 Dec 2016
Office Holiday Parties – The Fine Print
An office holiday party is a great time to unwind as a team and encourage a sense of community. Unfortunately,…
14 Dec 2012
British Columbia Court of Appeal Overturns Lower Court Decision on Profit Sharing Plan
Employers that decide to implement a profit sharing plan for employees should make sure that the terms of the plan…
14 Feb 2014
Courts Refuse to Restrain Former Salesperson from Competing – Greg McGinnis and Jeremy Schwartz (Demo)
Courts Refuse to Restrain Former Salesperson from Competing – Greg McGinnis and Jeremy Schwartz
04 Mar 2008
Addiction without compulsion: no defence to serious misconduct using the “hybrid” approach (Demo)
The law on addiction has evolved over the years in arbitral jurisprudence. Earlier decisions treated illness as a mitigating factor…
03 Mar 2017
Employers Face Possible Expansion of the Duty of Honesty and Good Faith
By Landon Young Do employers have a general duty to act honestly and in good faith when dealing with their…
13 Jan 2021
Bad facts make bad law (for employers): Court recognizes new tort of harassment
The Ontario Superior Court recently recognized a new tort that would allow employees to sue their employers for harassment in…
14 Jun 2017
2015 Q1 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 2: Retirement and Terminations (Demo)
Jessica Young explains the inherent risks associated with “encouraging” employees to retire.
21 Apr 2015
Director sentenced to jail time for failure to pay wages under the ESA (Demo)
In a recent decision, the Ontario Court of Justice sentenced the director of six Ontario companies, Steven Blondin, to 90…
19 Nov 2012
Rehiring Former Employees: Avoiding the Risk of “Continuous Employment” – Allison Taylor (Demo)
Rehiring Former Employees: Avoiding the Risk of “Continuous Employment” – Allison Taylor
03 Mar 2010
Appellate Court Finds that CERB is not Deductible from Wrongful Dismissal Damages
By Jeremy Schwartz and Haadi Malik In 2020, the Federal Government introduced the Canada Emergency Response Benefit (“CERB”), which was…
28 Dec 2022
Court of Appeal upholds decision granting employee notice period based on employment with predecessors
We have previously written on the decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Danbury v 1416088 Ontario Ltd (see our…
15 May 2015