Employers who only provide the minimum amounts required by employment standards legislation after termination are gambling. Sometimes this approach can result in cost savings, but it can also end in a costly damages and legal costs award as occurred in the case of Brito v. Canac Kitchens. Read our Latest Update for more information about the case, and what to do to protect your organization from such awards.
Parador Support / About Author
Related Posts
Shifting Sands: Ontario Court of Appeal Upholds Termination Clause
Employers, ever-weary of the next judicial pronouncement on the enforceability of specific termination clauses in employment contracts, may mark a…
28 Feb 2018
Employer Not Required to Bridge Terminated Employee to Retirement (Demo)
By: Landon Young and Jessica Young Non-unionized employees are entitled to “reasonable notice” of termination under the common law, or…
20 Apr 2015
Courts Refuse to Restrain Former Salesperson from Competing – Greg McGinnis and Jeremy Schwartz
Courts Refuse to Restrain Former Salesperson from Competing – Greg McGinnis and Jeremy Schwartz
04 Mar 2008
Employer Failed to Trigger Employee’s Duty to Mitigate – Court of Appeal
By: Landon Young and Jessica Young “Change or die” has become a truism in business today. Employers must be able…
30 Oct 2014
Ontario Court Continues Trend of Large Punitive Damages Awards (Demo)
By: Frank Portman Since 2008, Courts have wrestled with wrongful dismissal claims in which employees make claims of entitlements…
20 Nov 2015
Off-Duty Drunk Driving Not Just Cause for Termination – Even for a Firefighter (Demo)
In Klonteig v West Kelowna (District), the British Columbia Superior Court found that an employer that terminated a firefighter for driving…
27 Jun 2018
Mud in the Water: Divisional Court holds limiting language required to displace presumption of reasonable notice
It is becoming increasingly difficult for employers to understand what language is required in order for a termination clause to…
18 Dec 2018
Register Now for our Annual Conference
We’ve had a year to digest significant changes to labour and employment legislation, and the courts and tribunals continue to…
11 Sep 2019
Recent Amendments to Rule 76 Simplified Procedure
Recent amendments to Rule 76 of the Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure will help to reduce legal costs and streamline the litigation…
29 Jan 2020
Fixed-Term Fiasco: Employee Profits off of Termination of Term Contract (Demo)
Canadian employees are presumptively entitled to “reasonable notice” of termination. Although this entitlement can be limited to some extent by…
26 Apr 2016
Blame the Lawyer? Drawing Best Practices for In-House Counsel from the Jurisprudence
By: Jeremy Schwartz and Amanda Boyce In-house counsel is often the unsung hero of a legal saga, having guided their…
14 Sep 2016
Pay in Lieu of Notice by Salary Continuance Deemed Implicit Right (Demo)
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently ruled in Bowes v. Goss Power Products Ltd., that a fairly standard termination provision…
29 Sep 2011
When does a change in hours of work constitute a constructive dismissal? (Demo)
In Dechene v. Dr. Khurrum Ashraf Dentistry, an employee who had been employed by a verbal agreement was provided with a…
30 Aug 2012
Early Bird Registration Now Open: 16th Annual Employment Law Conference (Demo)
Stringer LLP and First Reference are proud to host the 16th Annual Ontario Employment Law Conference in Mississauga. We invite business owners and…
03 Mar 2015
What mental capacity is required to sign a release? (Demo)
In a past Stringer Update, Releases Protect Employers from Human Rights Complaints, we emphasized the importance of having terminated employees sign…
11 Oct 2012